Online dating is the most popular way couples meet | Stanford News

Articles on online dating

articles on online dating

https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-dating-apps-shape-romance-and-love-online-matchmaking-relationships-digital-age-11640727103. An increasing number of dating services boast about their use of biological research and genetic testing to better match prospective partners. Yet, while. Online dating has become increasingly popular over the years. Journal of Eating Disorders volume 7, Article number: 16 (2019) Cite this. articles on online dating

The science of online dating

References

  • Aaron A, Fisher H, Mashek DJ, Strong G, Li H, Brown LL (2005) Reward, motivation, and emotion systems associated with early-stage intense romantic love. J Neurophysiol94: 327–337 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bartels A, Zeki S (2000) The neural basis of romantic love. Neuroreport11: 3829–3834 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bartels A, articles on online dating, Zeki S (2004) The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love. Neuroimage21: 1155–1166 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Berglund H, Lindstrom P, Savic I (2006) Brain response to putative pheromones in lesbian women. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA103: 8269–8274 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Espinoza J (2009) Online dating sites flirt with record growth. Forbes [online] 6 Jan [Google Scholar]
  • Fisher H, Articles on online dating A, articles on online dating, Mashek D, Li H, Brown LL (2002) Defining the brain systems of lust, romantic attraction, and attachment. Arch Sex Behav31: 413–419 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Giddens A (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge, UK: Polity [Google Scholar]
  • Illouz E (2007) Cold Intimacies. The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity [Google Scholar]
  • Kosfeld M, Heinrichs M, Zak PJ, Fischbacher U, Fehr E (2005) Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature435: 673–676 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kronn D, Jansen V, Ostrer H (1998) Carrier screening for cystic fibrosis, Gaucher disease, and Tay–Sachs disease in the Ashkenazi Jewish population: the first 1,000 cases at New York University Medical Center, New York, NY. Arch Intern Med158: 777–781 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Meloy JR, Fisher H (2005) Some thoughts on the neurobiology of stalking. J Forensic Sci50: 1472–1480 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Savic I, Berglund H, Lindstrom P (2005) Brain response to putative pheromones in homosexual men. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA102: 7356–7361 [PMC free article] articles on online dating [Google Scholar]
  • Sherman L (2009) Best cities for singles 2009. Forbes [online] 27 Jul [Google Scholar]
  • Wedekind C, Seebeck T, Bettens F, Paepke AJ (1995) MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans, articles on online dating. Proc Biol Sci260: 245–249 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wilson G articles on online dating Finger-length as an index of assertiveness in women. Pers Individ Dif4: 111–112 [Google Scholar]
  • Zeki S (2007) The neurobiology of love. FEBS Lett581: 2575–2579 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zlotogora J (2009) Population programs for the detection of couples at risk for severe monogenic genetic disease. Hum Genet126: 247–253 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Источник: [https://torrent-igruha.org/3551-portal.html]

Articles on Online dating

Displaying 1 - 20 of 77 articles

Dating on apps is the new reality, but do they really make dating easier? A Cape Town study finds Tinder complicates it further.

Organized crime gangs in Southeast Asia use psychological profiling, elaborate scripts and algorithms to produce sophisticated scams. Using dating apps, they target vulnerable people looking for love.

Dating apps like Bumble have tried to shake up the gender dynamics of dating. Some users say their efforts fall flat.

Dogs have long been considered man’s best friend. And in the world of online dating, the presence of a canine articles on online dating indicates commitment.

Each year, more and more people are looking to dating apps to find a partner. And a trove of articles on online dating from these users is finally revealing what men and articles on online dating really want.

articles on online dating src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/398019/original/file-20210430-23-q9roa4.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&rect=395%2C16%2C3529%2C3529&q=45&auto=format&w=240&h=240&fit=crop">

The age of ‘artificial intimacy’ is upon us. What does it mean for the way we love, have sex and build friendships?

Granting police access to Tinder users’ information is problematic for many reasons (even if the intent is to keep people safe).

This Netflix series imagines we all articles on online dating a DNA-compatible soulmate waiting for us. But while there are companies in the real world matchmaking via DNA, love is more complex than that.

Since women see men who own pets more favorably, you’d think online daters with cats in their profile pics would get more matches…

From geopolitical tensions over - very - personal data to user strategies, discover the workings of an industry that is responsible for one in three marriages in the United States.

People looking for a potential partners online highly value a sense of humour but immigrants struggle with local jokes.

A relationship psychologist says dating apps probably aren’t the best way to find a mate. But if you are using them, he has a few tips.

The emergence of female-oriented erotica has been portrayed as a sign of women’s liberation, but research indicates that it reinforces cultural scripts of pornography targeting articles on online dating alt="" src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/347150/original/file-20200713-30-c8wp8v.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&rect=646%2C0%2C1994%2C1994&q=45&auto=format&w=240&h=240&fit=crop">

The coronavirus pandemic affected many aspects of everyday life — including our sex lives. But erotic technologies are gaining wider acceptance as we look for ways to fulfill our desires for intimacy.

Love in a time of corona.

Online dating platforms often provide a safe space for racist attitudes.

It doesn’t matter how smooth your conversations have been. Absent the touch, taste and smell of a potential partner, you’re essentially flying blind.

While online sex may not be a substitute for intimacy and touch, research shows there are many benefits. Technology can make sex more creative, for instance, and help people explore fantasies.

How do you encourage people to date when social distancing? Apps are trying to figure it out.

Research suggests the impact of dating apps depends on your local dating culture – and that varies hugely around the world.

Related Topics

  1. Dating
  2. Dating apps
  3. Digital economy
  4. Grindr
  5. Love
  6. Marriage
  7. Relationships
  8. Romance
  9. Sex
  10. Tinder

Top contributors

  1. Zoe Strimpel

    Postdoctoral Research Fellow, University of Sussex

  2. Chaim Kuhnreich

    PhD Candidate in Marketing, Concordia University

  3. Rob Brooks

    Scientia Professor of Evolutionary Ecology; Academic Lead of UNSW's Grand Challenges Program, UNSW Sydney

  4. Kath Albury

    Professor of Media and Communication and Associate Investigator, ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making + Society, Swinburne University of Technology

  5. Jennifer Power

    Associate Professor and Principal Research Fellow at the Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University

  6. Evita March

    Senior Lecturer in Psychology, Federation University Articles on online dating

  7. Cassandra Cross

    Associate Dean (Learning & Teaching) Faculty of Creative Industries, Education and Social Justice, Queensland University of Technology

  8. Andrea Waling

    ARC DECRA Senior Research Fellow in Sex & Sexuality, La Trobe University

  9. Yue Qian

    Assistant Professor of Sociology, University of British Columbia

  10. Treena Orchard

    Associate Professor, School of Health Studies, Western University

  11. articles on online dating Lisa Portolan

    PhD student, articles on online dating, Institute for Culture articles on online dating Society, articles on online dating, Western Sydney University

  12. Rosalie Gillett

    Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society, Queensland University of Technology

  13. Lauren Rosewarne

    Senior Lecturer, The University of Melbourne

  14. Carla Litchfield

    Associate professor, University of South Australia

  15. Karen Farquharson

    Head, School of Social and Political Sciences and Professor of Sociology, The University of Melbourne

More

Источник: [https://torrent-igruha.org/3551-portal.html]

Dating app use and unhealthy weight control behaviors among a sample of U.S. adults: a cross-sectional study

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Published:

Journal of Eating Disordersvolume 7, Article number: 16 (2019) Cite this article

  • 12k Accesses

  • 10 Citations

  • 375 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Background

Online dating has become increasingly popular over the years. Few research studies have examined the association between dating apps and disordered eating. In this study, we evaluated the association between dating app use articles on online dating unhealthy weight control behaviors (UWCBs) among a sample of U.S. adults.

Methods

Our sample includes 1769 adults who completed an online survey assessing dating app use and UWCBs in the past year. Survey assessed participants’ self-reported frequency of using dating apps within the past 30 days and engagement in six UWCBs with the purpose of lowering weight or changing their body shape within the past 12 months. UWCBs included vomiting, laxative use, fasting, diet pill use, muscle building supplement use, and use of anabolic steroids.

Results

Results of multivariate logistic regression models suggest dating app users had substantially elevated odds of UWCBs compared articles on online dating non-users (odds ratios [OR] range = 2.7—16.2). These findings were supported by results of additional gender-stratified multivariate logistic regression analyses among women and men.

Conclusions

This study’s findings contribute to the limited literature exploring the association between dating app use and adverse health outcomes, particularly UWCBs. While additional longitudinal and representative research is needed, public health professionals ought to explore dating app use as a potential risk factor for UWCBs.

Plain English summary

Dating app use is common among both men and women and these apps are often used to find romantic and sexual partners. They represent a growingly popular form of non-traditional media that provides a digital platform where people can evaluate others based on many attributes, including physical appearance. Despite their popularity, very little research has explored dating app use in relation to eating disorders and their risk factors. In this study, we assessed the cross-sectional association between dating app use and six unhealthy weight control behaviors (fasting, diet pill use, laxative use, self-induced vomiting, use of muscle-building supplements, and use of anabolic steroids) using an online survey completed by more than 1700 adults in the United States. Results showed that compared articles on online dating non-users, those who used dating apps had significantly elevated odds of UWCBs.

Background

Online dating has become increasingly popular in the United States (U.S.). Fifteen percent of U.S. adults say they have used online dating sites or mobile dating applications, or “dating apps”, in 2015 – a articles on online dating up from 11% in 2013 [1]. Young adults, defined as those between ages 18- to 24-years old, articles on online dating, as well as older adults, those in their 50s and 60s, contributed the most to this increase in dating app usage [1]. In articles on online dating, results from a 2017 survey suggest current dating app use could be as high as 30% among 18- to 29-year-old U.S. adults [2].

Mobile dating applications – commonly referred to as “dating apps” in popular culture – are designed to enable their users to locate potential romantic partners, friends, and other acquaintances [3]. And while they are primarily marketed as an avenue to find dates and potential romantic partners, motivations to use dating apps have evolved over time. For instance, people are using dating apps for socializing, to pass time, to improve their flirting and social skills, and to engage in casual sex [4,5,6]. Prior studies suggest that dating apps may serve as an avenue for members of sexual and gender minority groups (e.g., individuals who identity as gay, lesbian, bisexual, articles on online dating, transgender) to meet without having to disclose their sexual orientation identity or attraction to others in a more public setting [7], articles on online dating. Regardless of sexual orientation identity, the majority of online dating users agree that dating digitally has many advantages over other ways of finding romantic partners, such as increased ease of use and efficiency, and likelihood of finding a better match [1].

Speculation has grown over the frequency of dating app use and its relationship with body image dissatisfaction. In a study of nearly 1000 participants, Strubel and Petrie (2017) compared body image concerns between users and nonusers of the dating app Tinder. They found that regardless of gender, Tinder users reported significantly lower levels of satisfaction with their faces and bodies and higher levels of internalization, appearance comparisons and body shame compared to non-users [8]. As with social media platforms, such as Facebook and Instagram, dating apps articles on online dating allow people to connect, network and socialize with others, articles on online dating, often providing an opportunity to see other users’ semi-public profiles and photos [4]. On Tinder [9], which has an estimated 50 million users worldwide and 10 million active daily users [10], users can “swipe right” or “swipe left” to indicate if they respectively like or dislike a particular profile [8]. Thus, individual dating app users are continuously engaging in a cycle in which they are evaluating profile pictures and brief descriptions of others yet are being subject to scrutiny themselves. Some research studies also suggest dating apps may provide new avenues for appearance-based discrimination among users [11]. Results from a content analysis of 300 profiles of a dating app primarily used by men who have sex with men suggest femmephobia, articles on online dating, articles on online dating anti-effeminate, language was common among users [11].

In general, articles on online dating, the mass media has been linked to body image concerns [12]. Studies suggest that the mass media - from television, magazines, to social media – contributes to body dissatisfaction by perpetuating dominant body image ideals for men [13] and for women [14, 15]. For men, this articles on online dating constructed, dominant ideal is often one that is generally muscular with little body fat [16]. For women, the thin-ideal is often the idealized social norm for the female body [17] although the pressure to achieve this ideal may vary across racial/ethnic groups [18, 19]. Such media-portrayed images, which often are mostly unattainable and unrealistic, may result in body dissatisfaction and lead to unhealthy weight control behaviors (UWCBs) [20], articles on online dating, which include a constellation of dangerous behaviors, such as extreme food restriction (fasting), laxative use, self-induced vomiting, and diet pill use [21].

But despite the growing evidence linking various forms of the media, including social media, to body image dissatisfaction, very few have examined the role that dating apps play in this relationship [7, 8]. To the best of our knowledge, only one study has examined the association between dating app use and UWCBs [22]. The study, which was limited to a nationwide sample of sexual minority men in Australia and New Zealand, found a positive correlation between dating app use and eating disorder symptoms but no significant association between the two variables [22].

Given dating articles on online dating are a form of non-traditional media that provides a digital environment where users are being evaluated based on their physical appearance, we hypothesize dating app users will demonstrate elevated rates of UWCBs compared to non-users. In addition, based on prior research studies documenting disparities in UWCBs across racial and sexual orientation groups [23,24,25,26], we suspect that racial and sexual minorities will demonstrate elevated engagement in UWCBs compared to their white and heterosexual/straight counterparts.

Methods

Procedures

Researchers at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health conducted an articles on online dating survey as part of the Harvard Chan Physical Activity Study. This study was implemented using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) and has a broader aim of further understanding physical activity in the U.S. population and its relationship with social determinants and social stressors [27]. Study participants enrolled between October 2017 to December 2017 answered questions assessing frequency of dating app use and engagement in UWCBs.

MTurk is a website created and operated by Amazon since 2005 [28]. The website innovatively utilizes the method of crowdsourcing to engage a large number of online users who are registered “MTurk workers” to complete various tasks [29]. There are more than 500,000 registered MTurk workers worldwide, of which the majority are based in the U.S. [28]. Since its conception, various entities – including businesses and researchers – have used MTurk to recruit participants to complete surveys, engage in experiments, and a wide array of other activities [29], articles on online dating. Previous studies have been successful in utilizing MTurk to measure body image estimation and dissatisfaction [30]. For example, Gardner, Brown, and Boice (2012) recruited more than 300 participants through MTurk to complete an online questionnaire that assessed body image satisfaction among men and women. The authors suggest their experience with the crowdsourcing website supported findings from prior research [31] in that MTurk was an innovative source for generating inexpensive data of good quality. Furthermore, prior research suggests that compared to the general population, articles on online dating, MTurk participants are younger, of lower socioeconomic backgrounds, and more likely to be LGBTQ-identifying individuals [32,33,34].

Participants

Participants eligible for the Harvard Chan Physical Activity study were limited to adult men and women articles on online dating in the U.S. who were ages 18–65 years. Additionally, since one of the main goals of the study was to collect participants’ daily number of steps taken while carrying a mobile device, eligibility to complete the survey was limited to those using an iPhone 6 series smartphone or greater (e.g., iPhone 6 s, 7, 8, X). Thus, participants with older versions of the iPhone (before iPhone 6) and other mobile devices were not eligible. Participants received no more than $5 for completing the online survey. Since the number of eligible participants exposed to the online survey is not known, we cannot calculate a response rate. All participants provided informed consent for participating in the study.

To achieve the aims of our study, we focused our analyses on the 1769 participants of the Harvard Chan Physical Activity study who enrolled between October 2017 to December 2017 and answered questions assessing frequency of dating app use and engagement in UWCBs. Among this sample, we excluded 14 people (0.79%) who did not have complete data on any of the variables of interest. Additionally, we excluded 29 people (1.64%) who self-described their sexual orientation identity as “other” as the experiences and health articles on online dating of these participants may vary from those identifying as gay, lesbian, or bisexual [35]. Our final analytic sample included 1726 participants.

Measures

Dating app use

Participants were asked to indicate the frequency, articles on online dating, on articles on online dating, in which they used dating apps (e.g., Tinder, Grindr, Coffee Meets Bagel, etc.) within the past 30 days, articles on online dating. Response options were “never, less than once a day, articles on online dating, 1-4 times a day, 5 or more times a day.” Due to the small number of participants reporting dating app use as more than once a day, dating app use was made a binary variable indicating non-users and users.

Unhealthy weight control behaviors

A series of questions assessed participants’ engagement in UWCBs with the purpose of lowering weight or changing their body shape within the past 12 months. These UWCBs included fasting (not eating for at least a day), self-induced vomiting, using laxatives, using diet pills without a doctor’s advice, using anabolic steroids, and using muscle-building supplements (e.g., creatine, amino acids, DHEA, articles on online dating methyl-butyrate [HMB], or growth hormone). Response options were “never, less than once a month, 1-3 times a month, once a week, more than once a week.”

Demographic information

Participants reported their age in years (18–25, > 25–30, > 30–40, articles on online dating, > 40 years), annual household income in U.S. dollars (<$25 K, $25 K- < $50 K, $50 K- < $75 K, $75- < $100 K, >$100 K), sexual orientation identity (heterosexual, gay or lesbian, bisexual, other), sex (male, female), race/ethnicity (White non-Hispanic, White Hispanic, African American, Asian, multiple races/other), marital status (married, never married, articles on online dating, divorced, separated, widowed), and height and weight from which body mass index (BMI; kg/m2) was calculated. Due to the small number of participants who reported being divorced, widowed, or separated, marital status was categorized as married, never married, articles on online dating, or other.

Statistical analyses

We conducted all statistical analyses in 2018 using Stata 15 and R version 3.4.3. Frequencies and descriptive statistics were examined for all variables. Each of the UWCBs (e.g., fasting, self-induced vomiting, using laxatives, using diet pills, using anabolic steroids, and using muscle-building supplements) were examined independently. Each UWCB was dichotomized such that the response “never” scored 0 and responses “less than once a month,” “1-3 times a month,” “once a week,” and “more than once a week” scored 1. Chi-square tests were used to compare differences in sociodemographic characteristics and the dichotomized UWCBs between dating app users versus non-users among females and males. To achieve our study aims, we conducted a series of multivariate logistic regression models with dating app use as the main predictor, controlling for sex, race/ethnicity, income, age, marital status, sexual orientation, to estimate the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of each dichotomized UWCB. We also conducted our analyses separately for women and for men based on prior research findings suggesting gender differences in eating outcomes [36]. Significance level was set at alpha = 0.05 for all tests.

Results

Sample characteristics and prevalence of UWCBs

Table 1 presents the prevalence of sociodemographic characteristics and unhealthy weight control behaviors in our sample of app users and non-users (N = 1726), articles on online dating. Overall, 63.6% (n = 1098) of our sample were women and 36.4% (n = 628) were men. Among women, the majority were non-dating app users (83.3%, n = 915), white (68.6%, articles on online dating, n = 753), between ages 18 and 30 years (55.8%, n = 613), and identified as straight or heterosexual (86.5%, n = 950). Men demonstrated similar characteristics as most were also non-dating app users (66.7%, n = 419), white (68.0%, n = 427), between 18 and 30 years of age (58.8%, n = 369), and straight or heterosexual (88.9%, n = 558).

Full size table

UWCBs articles on online dating prevalent among both women and men, also presented articles on online dating Table 1. The prevalence of laxative use was 11.7% (n = 129) and 18.8% (n = 118) among women and men, articles on online dating, respectively. Nearly 9% (n = 95) of women and 16% (n = 98) of men reported vomiting for weight control. Other prevalent UWCBs include fasting (30.0% of women, n = 330; 36.0% of men, n = 226), diet pill use (13.0% women, n = 143; 16.7% men, n = 105), anabolic steroids (4.8% of women, n = 42; 14.6% of men, n = 92), and muscle building supplements (7.9% of women, n = 87; 28.7% of men, n = 180).

Results from chi-square tests articles on online dating presented in Table 1) suggest that engagement in each of the six UWCBs of interest in this study was higher among dating app users compared to non-users articles on online dating both males and females. The distribution of age, marital status, sexual orientation, and BMI were also significantly different between dating app users and non-users in both gender groups. For example, among both females and males, dating app users articles on online dating a higher proportion of non-married and sexual minority-identifying individuals (e.g., gay or bisexual) compared with non-users; the age distribution was also relatively younger among dating app users compared with non-users among both males and females.

Relationship between dating apps and UWCBs

Table 2 presents the multivariate logistic regression estimates of the odds of engaging in UWCBs among adults participating in the Harvard Chan Physical Activity study. Dating app users demonstrated significantly elevated odds of all six UWCBs (odds ratios ranged from 2.7 to 16.2) compared to those who were non-users, controlling for sex, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, income, age, and marital status. Compared to women, the odds of muscle building supplement and steroid use were significantly higher among men. Results also suggest Articles on online dating Americans demonstrated significantly elevated odds of engaging in all six UWCBs compared to white participants. Results did not suggest elevated odds of any UWCB based on sexual orientation identity.

Full size table

Tables 3 and 4 present the results of the gender-stratified multivariate logistic regression models for women and men, respectively. Women who use dating apps had 2.3 to 26.9 times the odds of engaging in all six UWCBs compared to women who were non-users. The same trend of elevated odds was found among men. Men who use dating apps had 3.2 to 14.6 times the odds of engaging in all six UWCBs compared to men who were non-users. Results of both gender-stratified analyses also highlighted racial/ethnic disparities as Asian American, African American, Hispanic, and other or mixed participants often demonstrated significantly higher odds of UWCB engagement compared to their white counterparts.

Full size table

Full size table

We also explored the role of BMI as a potential confounder in the relationship between dating app use and UWCBs. Our findings remained statistically significant despite the inclusion of BMI in our multivariate logistic regression models for all six UWCBs (See Additional file 1: Table S1).

Discussion

Our study adds to the limited public health literature on UWCBs and their association with the use of dating apps – an increasingly popular form of nontraditional media that is believed to be a contributor of body dissatisfaction [22]. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the association between dating app use and UWCBs among U.S. adults. Specifically, we hypothesized dating app users would demonstrate elevated engagement of UWCBs, such as self-induced vomiting, fasting, and diet pill use, articles on online dating. Such behaviors are not medically recommended for weight loss and are considered clinically relevant symptoms of eating disorders [37]. Our results supported this hypothesis. First, articles on online dating, our analyses revealed a high prevalence of various UWCBs among the men and articles on online dating in our study - ranging from self-induced vomiting for weight control to anabolic steroid use. Additionally, our results documented a higher prevalence of the six UWCBs among dating app users than non-users in our study. These findings may be a result of the image- and appearance-centered culture of dating apps as users attempt to find sexual and/or romantic partners; such claims, however, warrant additional study. Articles on online dating with existing literature, we documented elevated rates of UWCBs among racial/ethnic minorities [38, 39]. For example, a prior study of nearly 17,000 U.S, articles on online dating. adolescents found that the odds of UWCBs were elevated 2–10 times in most ethnic groups relative to whites [39]. This finding partially supported our second hypothesis that dating app users belonging to racial/ethnic and sexual minority groups would demonstrate higher rates of UWCBs. Our results highlighted racial/ethnic disparities as African Americans reported higher odds of UWCBs compared to their white counterparts. We also documented elevated engagement in many UWCBs among Asian American, articles on online dating, Hispanic and other or mixed dating app users. We did not, however, find elevated odds of UWCBs based on sexual orientation. Prior research have found sexual minority men to be at greater articles on online dating for eating disorders, such as anorexia and bulimia nervosa, compared with heterosexual men [40,41,42]; studies also suggest that sexual minority men place high priority on physical attractiveness and thinness [43, 44], as well as increased desire for muscularity [45]. .

With the tremendous growth in their usage in the U.S. [1], and an increasing number of studies linking their use to body image concerns and UWCBs, there is an urgency to further understand articles on online dating dating apps influence health behaviors and outcomes. And while these apps allow users to communicate with each other, and often privately, prior studies suggest this avenue of digital communication has proliferated interpersonal discrimination, such as racism and weight shaming [11].

According to the Tripartite Influence model [46, 47], appearance pressures from peers, articles on online dating, parents, and the media lead to body image dissatisfaction and UWCBs [46]. Dating apps, arguably another form of modern-day social media, often contain commercial ads and user profiles depicting images conveying societally accepted image ideals for men and women. Thus, articles on online dating, as with other forms of media, users of dating apps may internalize such societal appearance ideals and possibly compare their own appearance to those that they see – two processes that the Tripartite Model posits lead to body image dissatisfaction and ultimately eating disturbances [48, 49]. Therefore, future studies, particularly those executing a longitudinal design, ought to apply the framework of the Tripartite Model by exploring the role of peers, articles on online dating, family, and other media in the relationship between dating app use and UWCBs.

Overall, our study has several limitations for consideration. The cross-sectional design of the study and absence of long-term assessment of dating app use limited our ability to establish temporal or causal relationships between dating apps and UWCBs. It is possible that individuals already engaging in UWCBs may be drawn to using dating apps, and that dating app articles on online dating in turn could exacerbate disordered eating behavior symptoms. Our cross-sectional study cannot disentangle these different articles on online dating pathways but highlights the need for additional studies (e.g., cohort or quasi-experimental) to identify the causal links between dating app use and UWCBs. In addition, the results of the online survey used in this study articles on online dating on self-reported data and did not collect indicators of psychosocial factors, such as experiences with weight stigma, body image concerns, self-esteem, and depression, which may be possible mediating variables in the relationship between body dissatisfaction and UWCBs [50]. Our findings are also limited in regards to generalizability as participants were restricted to U.S.-based participants in possession of an iPhone 6 series or greater, who may have differing sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., income) from those with other mobile devices [51]. In addition, articles on online dating, MTurk workers are not necessarily representative of the general population (e.g., overrepresentation of women) [52]. The online survey did not assess the types and brands of dating app services used by our participants, as some may have less tolerance for appearance-based discrimination among users [53]. For instance, multiple dating app services began imposing profile changes and interventions intended to dating questions to ask a black man discrimination as well as promote inclusivity on their platforms in fall 2018. The dating app “Scruff,” which is geared towards men who have sex with men, no longer requires ethnicity to be listed on user profiles and began sending in-app messages to users who display “racial language” on their profiles [54]. Lastly, we articles on online dating not assess participants’ motivation for dating app use (e.g., to find romantic partners, sexual partners, and/or friends). Such information could further explain the possible relationship between dating app use and UWCBs.

Conclusions

This study contributes to the limited literature by exploring the association between dating app use and UWCBs, articles on online dating. Whether the use of dating apps can be attributed to adverse health outcomes, including UWCBs, remains unclear. The findings from our study, however, continue to fuel speculations that dating app users may be at risk of preventable physical and mental health outcomes. Therefore, identifying individuals at risk of eating disorders and their risk factors is critical in informing effective public health efforts aimed at alleviating the global burden of these potentially deadly yet preventable conditions. Based on our findings, articles on online dating, we recommend future studies aim to assess the association between dating app use and UWCBs temporally and use a more representative sample. Such studies should specifically explore the underlying mechanisms as to how and why dating app use may contribute to UWCBs and possibly the development of eating disorders.

Abbreviations

Unhealthy weight control behaviors

References

  1. Smith A. 15% of American Adults Have Used Online Dating Sites or Mobile Dating Apps: Pew Research Center; 2016.

    Google Scholar

  2. Statista. Online dating - Statistics & Facts. Statista.com; 2018 [cited 2018 October 22]; Available from: https://www.statista.com/topics/2158/online-dating/.

  3. Chan LS, articles on online dating. The role of gay identity confusion and Outness in sex-seeking on Mobile dating apps among men who have sex with men: a conditional process analysis. J Homosex. 2017;64(5):622–37.

    Article articles on online dating Google Scholar

  4. Timmermans E, Caluwe ED. To tinder or not to tinder, that's the question: an individual differences perspective to tinder use and motives. Personal Individ Differ. 2017;110:74–9.

    Article Google Scholar

  5. Chan LS. Who uses dating apps? Exploring the relationships among trust, sensation-seeking, articles on online dating, smartphone use, and the intent to use dating apps based on the integrative model. Comput Hum Behav. articles on online dating Google Scholar

  6. Clemens C, Atkin D, articles on online dating, Krishnan A. The influence of biological and personality traits on gratifications obtained through online dating websites. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;49:120–9.

    Article articles on online dating Google Scholar

  7. Blackwell C, Birnholtz J, Abbott C. Seeing and being seen: co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app. New Media Soc. 2014;17(7):1117–36.

    Article Google Scholar

  8. Strubel J, Petrie TA. Love me tinder: body image and psychosocial functioning among men and women. Body Image. 2017;21:34–8.

    Article Google Scholar

  9. Tinder. N.D. [cited 2018 9 February ]; Available from: https://tinder.com/.

  10. Smith C. 45 Articles on online dating Tinder Statistics and Facts (January 2018): By the Numbers; 2018.

    Google Scholar

  11. Miller B. “Dude, Where’s your face?” self-presentation, self-description, articles on online dating, articles on online dating partner preferences on a social networking articles on online dating for men who have sex with men: a content analysis. Sex Cult. 2015;19(4):637–58.

    Article Google Scholar

  12. Fardouly J, Willburger BK, Vartanian LR. Instagram use and young women’s body image concerns and self-objectification: testing mediational pathways. New Media Soc. 2017:20 (4):1380-95. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461444817694499?journalCode=nmsa.

  13. Tylka TL. Refinement of the tripartite influence model for men: dual body image pathways to body change behaviors. Body image. 2011;8(3):199–207.

    Article Google Scholar

  14. Papp I, Urban R, Czegledi E, Babusa B, Tury F. Testing the tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbance among Hungarian adolescents. Body Image. 2013;10(2):232–42.

    Article Google Scholar

  15. Markey CN. Culture and the development of eating disorders: a tripartite model. Eat Disord. 2004;12(2):139–56.

    Article Google Scholar

  16. Olivardia R Jr, Pope HG Jr, Borowiecki JJ, Cohane GH. Biceps and body image: the relationship between muscularity and self-esteem, depression, and eating disorder symptoms. Psychol Men Masculinity. 2004;5(2):112–20.

    Article Google Scholar

  17. Drury CA, Louis M. Exploring the association between body weight, articles on online dating, stigma of obesity, articles on online dating, and health care avoidance. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2002;14(12):554–61.

    Article Google Scholar

  18. Powell AD, Kahn AS. Racial differences in women's desires to be thin. Int J Eat Disord. Clin Trial Comp Study Randomized Controlled Trial. 1995;17(2):191–5.

    Google Scholar

  19. Overstreet NM, Quinn DM, Agocha VB. Beyond thinness: the influence of a curvaceous body ideal on body dissatisfaction in black and white women. Sex Roles, articles on online dating. 2010;63(1–2):91–103.

    Article Google Scholar

  20. Stice E. Risk and maintenance factors for eating pathology: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2002;128(5):825–48.

    Article Google Scholar

  21. Gonsalves D, Hawk H, Goodenow C. Unhealthy weight control behaviors and related risk factors in Massachusetts middle and high school students. Matern Child Health J. 2014;18(8):1803–13.

    Article Google Scholar

  22. Griffiths S, Murray SB, Krug I, McLean SA. The contribution of social media to body dissatisfaction, eating disorder symptoms, and anabolic steroid use among sexual minority men. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, articles on online dating. 2018;24:149–56. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5865626/.

  23. Austin SB, articles on online dating, Nelson LA, Birkett MA, Calzo JP, Everett B. Eating disorder symptoms and obesity at the intersections of gender, ethnicity, and sexual orientation in US high school students. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(2):e16–22.

    Article Google Scholar

  24. Watson RJ, Adjei J, Saewyc E, Homma Y, Goodenow C. Trends and disparities in disordered eating among heterosexual and sexual minority adolescents. Int J Eat Disord. 2017;50(1):22–31.

    Article Google Scholar

  25. Rodgers RF, Peterson KE, Hunt AT, articles on online dating, Spadano-Gasbarro JL, Richmond TK, Greaney ML, et al. Racial/ethnic and weight status disparities in dieting and disordered weight control behaviors among early adolescents. Eat Behav. 2017;26:104–7.

    Article Google Scholar

  26. Rodgers RF, Watts AW, Austin SB, Haines J, Neumark-Sztainer D. Disordered eating in ethnic minority adolescents with overweight. Int J Eat Disord. 2017;50(6):665–71.

    Article Google Scholar

  27. Howe KB, Suharlim C, Ueda P, Howe D, articles on online dating, Articles on online dating I, Rimm EB. Gotta catch'em all! Pokemon GO and physical activity among young adults: difference in differences study, articles on online dating. BMJ. 2016;355:i6270.

    Article Google Scholar

  28. Amazon Mechanical Turk. 2017 [cited 2018 2 February]; Available from: https://www.mturk.com/mturk/welcome.

  29. Hitlin P. Research in the Crowdsourcing Age, a Case Study: Pew Research Center; 2016.

    Google Scholar

  30. Gardner RM, Brown DL, articles on online dating, Boice R. Using Amazon's Mechanical Turk website to measure accuracy of body size estimation and body dissatisfaction. Body image. 2012;9(4):532–4.

    Article Google Scholar

  31. Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD. Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data? Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011;6(1):3–5.

    Article Google Scholar

  32. Arditte KA, Cek D, Shaw AM, Timpano KR. The importance of assessing clinical phenomena in Mechanical Turk research. Psychol Assessment. 2016;28(6):684–91.

    Article Google Scholar

  33. Goodman JK, Paolacci G. Crowdsourcing consumer research. J Consum Res. 2017;44(1):196–210.

    Article Google Scholar

  34. Chandler J, Shapiro D, articles on online dating. Conducting Clinical Research Using Crowdsourced Convenience Samples. Ann Rev Clin Psychol. 2016;12:53–81.

    Article Google Scholar

  35. Evans L, Lawler K, Sass S. Gathering sexual orientation data on statewide behavioral risk factor surveillance surveys: a call to action for states. Boston: Fenway Health; 2014. https://fenwayhealth.org/documents/the-fenway-institute/policy-briefs/COM484_BRFSS_Brief.pdf.

  36. Croll J, Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M, articles on online dating, Ireland M. Prevalence and risk and protective factors related to disordered eating behaviors among adolescents: relationship to gender and ethnicity. J Adolescent Health. 2002;31(2):166–75.

    Article articles on online dating Google Scholar

  37. Stephen EM, Rose JS, Kenney L, Rosselli-Navarra F, Weissman RS. Prevalence and correlates of unhealthy weight control behaviors: findings from the national longitudinal study of adolescent health, articles on online dating. J Eat Disord. 2014;2:16.

    Article Google Scholar

  38. Story M, French SA, Resnick MD, Blum RW, articles on online dating. Ethnic/racial and socioeconomic differences in dieting behaviors and body image perceptions in adolescents. Int J Eat Disord. 1995;18(2):173–9.

    Article Google Scholar

  39. Austin SB, Spadano-Gasbarro J, Greaney ML, Richmond TK, Feldman HA, Osganian SK, et al. Disordered weight control behaviors in early adolescent boys and girls of color: an under-recognized factor in the epidemic of childhood overweight. Articles on online dating Adolescent Health. 2011;48(1):109–12.

    Article Google Scholar

  40. Calzo JP, Blashill AJ, Brown TA, Argenal RL. Eating Disorders and Disordered Weight and Shape Control Behaviors in Sexual Minority Populations. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017;19(8):49.

    Article Google Scholar

  41. Kane GD. Revisiting gay men's body image issues: exposing the fault lines. Rev Gen Psychol. 2010;14(4):311–7.

    Article Google Scholar

  42. Andersen AE. Eating disorders in gay males. Psychiatr Ann. 1999;29(4):206–12.

    Article Google Scholar

  43. Lanzieri N, Hildebrandt T. Using objectification theory to examine the effects of media on gay male body image. Clin Soc Work J. 2016;44(1):105–13.

    Article Google Scholar

  44. Siever MD. Sexual orientation and gender as factors in socioculturally acquired vulnerability to body dissatisfaction and eating disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994;62(2):252–60.

    Article Google Scholar

  45. Brennan DJ, Craig SL, Thompson DE. Factors associated with a drive for muscularity among gay and bisexual men. Cult Health Sex. 2012;14(1):1–15.

    Article Google Scholar

  46. Shroff H, Thompson JK. The tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbance: a replication with adolescent girls. Body Image. 2006;3(1):17–23.

    Article Google Scholar

  47. van den Berg P, Thompson JK, Obremski-Brandon K, Coovert M. The tripartite influence model of body image and eating disturbance: a covariance structure modeling investigation testing the mediational role of appearance comparison. J Psychosom Res. 2002;53(5):1007–20.

    Article Google Scholar

  48. Rodgers R, Chabrol H, Paxton SJ. An exploration of the tripartite influence model of body dissatisfaction and disordered eating among Australian and French college women. Body Image. 2011;8(3):208–15.

    Article Google Scholar

  49. Keery H, van den Berg P, Thompson JK. An evaluation of the tripartite influence model of body dissatisfaction and eating disturbance with adolescent girls. Body Image. 2004;1(3):237–51.

    Article Google Scholar

  50. Brechan I, Kvalem IL. Relationship between body dissatisfaction and disordered eating: mediating role of self-esteem and depression. Eat Behav. 2015;17:49–58.

    Article Google Scholar

  51. Gotz FM, Stieger S, Reips UD. Users of the main smartphone operating systems (iOS, android) differ only little in personality. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0176921.

    Article Google Scholar

  52. Paolacci G, Chandler J. Inside the Turk: understanding mechanical Turk as a participant Pool. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2014;23(3):184–8.

    Article articles on online dating Google Scholar

  53. O'Malley K. Bumble wrote the Most badass letter to a user banned for fat-shaming a woman on the app. Elle. 2017.

  54. Silverberg E. Scruff wants to end the days of 'No Asians' or 'Only Latinos'. Advocate. 2018. https://www.advocate.com/commentary/2018/9/13/scruff-wants-end-days-no-asians-or-only-latinos.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the members of articles on online dating Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity and Expression (SOGIE) research working group for providing their constructive feedback during the writing process of this study.

Funding

The authors declare that no funding was received for this study.

Availability of data and articles on online dating data that support the findings of this manuscript are available from the principal investigator of the Harvard Chan Physical Activity Study, Dr. Christian Suharlim. Data may be available upon request and with permission of Dr. Suharlim at csuharlim@mail.harvard.edu.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Nutrition, Harvard TH Articles on online dating School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, articles on online dating, USA

    Alvin Tran & Kirsten Davison

  2. Department of Social and Articles on online dating Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Articles on online dating Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

    Alvin Tran, Kirsten Davison, Madina Agénor & S. Bryn Austin

  3. Center for Health and Decision Science, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 718 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

    Christian Suharlim

  4. Department of Biostatistics, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, 655 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

    Heather Mattie

  5. Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

    S. Bryn Austin

Contributions

AT led the concept, preparation, and submission of the manuscript. CT lead the collection of the data, articles on online dating. AT and HM analyzed the data. KD, MA, and SBA revised the manuscript draft. All authors have approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alvin Tran.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent articles on online dating participate

The Harvard Chan Physical Activity study was articles on online dating by the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Institutional Review Board (IRB16–2099).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Источник: [https://torrent-igruha.org/3551-portal.html]

Meeting online has become the most popular way U.S. couples connect, Stanford sociologist finds

Algorithms, and not friends and family, are now the go-to matchmaker for people looking for love, Stanford sociologist Michael Rosenfeld has found.

Online dating has become the most common way for Americans to find romantic partners. (Image credit: altmodern / Getty Images)

In a new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Rosenfeld found that heterosexual couples are more likely to meet a romantic partner online than through personal contacts and connections. Since 1940, traditional ways of meeting partners – through family, in church and in the neighborhood – have all been in decline, Rosenfeld said.

Rosenfeld, a lead author on the research and a professor of sociology in the School of Humanities and Sciences, drew on a nationally representative 2017 survey of American adults and found that about 39 percent of heterosexual couples reported meeting their partner online, compared to 22 percent in 2009. Sonia Hausen, a graduate student in sociology, was a co-author of the paper and contributed to the research.

Rosenfeld has studied mating and dating as well as the internet’s effect on society for two decades.

Stanford News Service interviewed Rosenfeld about his research.

 

What’s the main takeaway from your research on online dating?

Meeting a significant other online has replaced meeting through friends. People trust the new dating technology more and more, and the stigma of meeting online seems to have worn off.

In 2009, articles on online dating, when I last researched how people find their significant others, most people were still using a friend as an intermediary to meet their partners. Back then, if people used online websites, they still turned to friends for help setting up their profile page. Friends also helped screen potential romantic interests.

 

What were you surprised to find?

I was surprised at how much online dating has displaced the help of friends in meeting a romantic partner. Our previous thinking was that the role of friends in dating would never be displaced. Articles on online dating it seems like online dating is displacing it. That’s an important development in people’s relationship with technology.

 

What do you believe led to the shift in how people meet their significant other?

There are two core technological innovations that have each elevated online dating. The first innovation was the birth of the graphical World Wide Web around 1995. There had been a trickle of online dating in the old text-based bulletin board systems prior to 1995, but the graphical web put pictures and search at the forefront of the internet. Pictures and search appear to have added a lot to the internet dating experience. The second core innovation is the spectacular rise of the smart articles on online dating in the 2010s. The rise of the smart phone took internet dating off the desktop and put it in everyone’s pocket, all the time.

Also, the online dating systems have much larger pools of potential partners compared to the number of people your mother knows, or the number of people your best friend knows. Dating websites have enormous advantages of scale. Even if most of the people in the pool are not to your taste, a larger choice set makes it more likely you can find someone who suits you.

 

Does your finding indicate that people are increasingly less social?

No. If we spend more time online, it does not mean we are less social.

When it comes to single people looking for romantic partners, the online dating technology is only a good thing, in my view. It seems to me that it’s a basic human need to find someone else to partner with and if technology is helping that, then it’s doing something useful.

The decline of meeting partners through family isn’t a sign that people don’t need their family anymore. It’s just a sign that romantic partnership is taking place later in life.

In addition, in our study we found that the success of a relationship did not depend on whether the people met online or not. Ultimately, it doesn’t matter how you met your significant other, the relationship takes a life of its own after the initial meeting.

 

What does your research reveal about the online world?

I think that internet dating is a modest positive addition to our world. It is generating interaction between people that we otherwise wouldn’t have.

People who have in the past had trouble finding a potential partner benefit the most from the broader choice set provided by the dating apps.

Internet dating has the potential to serve people who were ill-served by family, friends and work. One group of people who was ill-served was the LGBTQ+ community. So the rate of gay couples meeting online is much higher than for heterosexual couples.

 

You’ve studied dating for over two decades. Why did you decide to research online dating?

The landscape of dating is just one aspect of our lives that is being affected by technology. And I always had a natural interest in how new articles on online dating was overturning the way we build our relationships.

I was curious how couples meet and how has it changed over time. But no one has looked too deeply into that question, so Articles on online dating decided to research it myself.

Источник: [https://torrent-igruha.org/3551-portal.html]

Is Online Dating Worth It?

The search for love in the digital age tends to stir up a lot of anxiety. If you've ever heard stories from your friends about their bad dates, you might reasonably approach dating apps with caution. But just as online dating can foster some comically bad experiences, there are plenty of benefits as well. Many of us articles on online dating couples who seem so perfectly matched that it's almost impossible to believe they met on opposite sides of a screen.

When it comes down to it, does online dating actually work? While you might be worried it's not a good idea (or even a waste of time), like all matters in love, it has its pros and cons. We decided to bring the question to licensed marriage and family therapist and relationship expert Lisa Marie Bobby, Ph.D., of Growing Self Counseling and Coaching.

Dating apps can lead to superficiality and ghosting, but there are also many positives. "While online dating has some potential for pitfalls articles on online dating to meeting people in real life, the volume of possibilities is much higher," says Bobby. "That increases the chances that you'll meet someone you're truly compatible with."

So let's put the fears to rest—and put the internet to the test. Read on to learn expert advice on how well online dating really works.

Best Dating Apps of 2022

What Research Says About Dating Apps

Research shows that online dating is on the rise. A Pew Research Center study conducted in October 2019 found that 30 percent of Americans have used online dating, compared to just 11 percent in 2013. Of those, 12 percent have gotten married or been in a committed relationship with someone they met through online dating—a notable increase from just 3 percent in 2013.

Online dating appears to be a practical way to date for most people. According to the study, roughly 60 percent of participants have had positive experiences with dating platforms. Many people have success finding romantic partners online, whether they're looking for something casual or long term. Overall, the majority of participants found it relatively easy to meet potentially compatible partners in terms articles on online dating those they found attractive or with whom they shared hobbies and interests.

Research shows, however, there are negative side effects of online dating, particularly for young women. According to the survey, 60 percent of women ages 18 to 34 say someone on an app or dating site kept contacting them after they said they weren't interested while about the same percentage of women in that age group reported that they were sent unsolicited sexually explicit pictures or messages.

Bobby says the reason for many of the negative aspects of online dating could be a lack of what she calls a "shared community." "Connecting through online dating feels much more like meeting a virtual stranger and having to establish points of meaningful connection with little real-world experience to go on," she says. "Furthermore, the absence of a shared community or relationships make it easier to ghost or be inconsiderate without concern of consequences to your reputation or comfort in your community."

How to Get the Most Out of Online Dating

Before you download an app or two and create your profile, Bobby recommends some soul-searching, articles on online dating. The last thing you want to do is start matching with people online, get to talking, and realize you have no idea what you're looking for out of a partner or a relationship.

"Spend time and energy getting clear about who you are and what you really want in a relationship, and think about who your ideal partner is," says Bobby. "Also, think about what your ideal partner is articles on online dating in a prospective mate and how you can connect with them authentically."

It's also important to do some research about the app you decide to download and find out how it works, articles on online dating. Then, spend some time and energy on your profile. Choose pictures and prompts articles on online dating show who you are, what you like, and how you present yourself to the world. If it's clear you haven't put any thought or effort into your profile, potential partners might assume you'll take the same approach in a relationship.

Once you've created your profile, don't expect to meet "the one" right away, and prepare to spend a significant amount of time vetting potential partners. But since we don't have all the time in the world to swipe, having a system to weed out those with whom you are incompatible is key. "Develop a process to help you cut through the fluff and get to know who someone really is as quickly as possible," she says. "A five-minute call will often tell you all you need to know."

Move from texting to a phone or video call ASAP for a better sense of mutual interest and compatibility. Even if it feels awkward, it can save you a lot of time—and disappointment.

Articles on online dating to Avoid When Using Dating Apps

Odds are, if you've participated in online dating, you have a few bad date stories. Often the cause of these negative experiences is that your expectations don't match up with reality. Bobby says that while online dating requires some "marketing savvy" and the ability to, in essence, sell yourself online, you shouldn't sacrifice the truth to come across as what you perceive to be "better."

"Never misrepresent yourself or try to appear as something you're not," she says. "You might get online interactions, but they'll quickly fizzle when it becomes apparent that you are different than what your potential partner was expecting." If you're looking for a truly meaningful relationship, concealing aspects of yourself that you're afraid others won't like or accept on your profile is counterproductive. Be authentic, and you'll attract those with similar values.

On the other hand, avoid falling victim to someone you suspect is being deceitful on their profile by noticing red flags. Not everyone has social media or updates it regularly, but most people who do will be glad to share their profiles with you when asked. And most of the time, if someone is truly interested, they'll hop on a phone call or video chat with you before meeting up, even if they feel a bit awkward. Going into a date "cold" with someone you aren't entirely sure about can often end up being a waste of time and lead to disappointment.

Lastly, when you do get that match or first date, it's important for you and a prospective partner to feel a certain kardashians dating black guys, but don't rely on it completely. "When you are evaluating potential partners, do not make the mistake of prioritizing 'chemistry' over character," says Bobby. Too much articles on online dating and charm may give you butterflies, but it can also be a sign that the person is a "player" or even a narcissist. dating sites in atlanta for depth, emotional intelligence, empathy, friendship, aligned values, and psychological flexibility if a long-term relationship is your goal.

How Likely Are You to Find "The One" Online?

A healthy relationship is totally possible whether you're meeting people in person or online, but the two methods differ for a variety of reasons. The fact is, there are positives to meeting IRL. When two people meet organically, it's probably because they already have something in common, like friends or hobbies. "This natural convergence of circumstances, relationships, or interests is a strength for a new relationship," says Bobby. "They provide a budding couple with more opportunities for authentic connection as well as more social pressure to treat each other decently, even if it's not ultimately a good match."

But that doesn't mean online dating can't be equally as successful. Since everyone on a dating site is (presumably) available, you have ample opportunities to put yourself out there and find a good match. When you engage in social events where you're likely to meet new people, the pool of those who are single and looking is much smaller than when you're on an app or dating site where everyone is in the same boat as you.

"Singles seeking relationships are looking to connect online," says Bobby, articles on online dating. "That reality means that it's highly likely of finding 'the one' because they're in the same place, also looking for you!" If you're straightforward about what you want, it increases your chances of finding a good partner even more.

No matter your intentions, there seems to be something for everyone when dating online—just be clear about your expectations. Embrace new experiences, articles on online dating, learn a little about yourself, and don't forget to have fun. You may even meet your dream partner.

The 6 Essential Rules of Dating

Brides takes every opportunity to use high-quality sources, articles on online dating, including peer-reviewed studies, to support the facts within our articles. Read our editorial guidelines to learn more about how we keep our content accurate, reliable and trustworthy.

  1. Vogels EA. 10 Facts About Americans and Online Dating. Pew Research Center. February 6, 2020.

Источник: [https://torrent-igruha.org/3551-portal.html]

Dangerous Liaisons: is everyone doing it online?

Main Findings

  • As many as one-in-three people are dating online
  • People turn to online dating for a variety articles on online dating reasons – 48% do it for fun, while articles on online dating look for more meaningful relationships and one-in-ten are simply looking for sex (13%)
  • People share information with others too easily when they are dating online, with a quarter (25%) admitting they share their full name publicly on their dating profile. One-in-ten have shared their home address, and the same number have shared naked photos of themselves this way, exposing them to risk
  • Even though lying is one of the most hated aspects of online dating, 57% of online daters lie to each other, faking a range of attributes such as their names, marital status, location and appearance
  • People are concerned for their safety when they date online, with some of the main concerns involving worries about IT security – for example, 63% are concerned about the device they use for online dating becoming infected and 61% are concerned about their data being stolen or leaked from the dating app or service itself
  • These concerns are well-founded – 55% have experienced some form of threat or problem while dating online. Articles on online dating, people that use online dating are twice as likely to experience an IT security incident than people that don’t (41% vs 20%), primarily due to their increased level of online activity in general
  • Protection is also an issue for people that indulge in online dating. Just 27% of online daters use a security solution to protect their device and 16% do nothing at all to protect themselves as articles on online dating see no risk

Introduction

Digital technology, especially smart devices, have transformed many aspects of our society, including how people meet each other and establish relationships – romantic or otherwise.

Attitudes towards dating apps and services have grown progressively more positive in recent years. Testament to this fact, when Pew Research Centre first questioned Americans about online dating in 2005, just 44% said the activity is a good way to meet people, and the majority thought it was a poor replacement for striking up relationships in the ‘real’ world, articles on online dating. But the way we communicate, meet and express our love has changed dramatically since then, and when Articles on online dating Research Centre repeated the study ten years later, the number that considered online dating to be a good way of meeting people had grown to 59%.

How we conduct our relationships is changing, and it’s clear that technology has a key part to play in this change. People are now not only turning to their devices to work, shop, and play, but to manage their personal lives and relationships too.

Online dating is becoming more popular. But with concerns rife following incidents such as the infamous Ashley Madison breach, articles on online dating, and with the process inherently articles on online dating users to share personal information, it’s important to consider the potential dangers involved. Are online daters giving away too much about themselves? Are they, through online dating, exposing themselves and their devices to malicious people – or indeed malware – all too easily?

To understand the topic better and to help users protect themselves when they are dating online, Kaspersky Lab has undertaken a study into people’s online dating habits. The following report summarises our findings.

Methodology

An online survey conducted by research firm B2B International and Kaspersky Lab in August 2017 assessed the attitudes of 21,081 users aged over 16 years old articles on online dating 32 countries.

This report outlines the responses of 6,458 online dating users from 30 of the countries surveyed (answers from respondents in China and the UAE have been excluded) regarding their online activity, including the types of devices they use, the kind of information they share, and any concerns they might have about online dating apps and services.

Data was weighted to be globally representative and consistent, split equally between men and women, articles on online dating, and not all the results from the study have been included in this report. To request further data please contact Kaspersky Lab at prhq@kaspersky.com.

Look around. Someone near you is dating online

Online dating provides users with the ideal place to meet people that have similar likes, dislikes and character traits to them. It improves the chances of a user actually liking the person they’re going to meet on a date (because they can search for people that meet certain criteria), and, if you believe the online dating services themselves, an increasing number of people are also now finding lasting and meaningful relationships online. Considering all of this, perhaps it’s no surprise our study found that as many as 32% of Internet users are dating online.

So, if one-in-three people out there are doing it, who is the typical online dater?

Although such a large number of people are dating online, our study has found that if you decide to take part, you are most likely to be in the company of users that meet the following criteria.

People that date online are most likely to be:

  • 33.8 years old on average
  • Working full-time (63%)
  • Slightly more likely to be male than female (39% of men date online vs 25% of women)
  • Device-savvy – they have around 5 mobile devices compared to the usual 3 per household
  • They are most likely to work as medium-level managers (20%) or be highly qualified specialists such as scientific workers, teachers and engineers (19%)

Many people that are on the online dating scene are young, as the 33.8 average age suggests, with 43% of 25-34 year olds using online dating services. This tech-savvy age group is likely embracing online dating as a way to meet interesting new people while balancing busy professional lives.

Meanwhile, people that class themselves as the head of a company or business owners make up a surprisingly large one-in-ten (11%) of the online dating population. Interestingly, we also found that 31% of people that are married or living with a partner are using online dating.

Online daters are most likely to visit dating apps and services from Windows PCs and Android smartphones than any other type of device. And, 51% of online daters admit to using a device that they use for work to carry out their online dating activities, despite the fact that they may be putting confidential corporate data at risk by doing so.

A pocket-sized relationship?

So why are these people going online to start up relationships with others? Certainly, online dating provides all the convenience of making it quick and easy to meet people. Plus, it’s an activity that’s available across multiple devices, at all times of day and night.

Our study asked people why they turn to online dating and while half (48%) said they mostly use online dating for fun, other reasons were also evident, with some saying they are looking for more meaningful relationships, and around one-in-ten simply looking for sex (13%).

These findings suggest that there is still a degree of cynicism around the success of online dating, with people being twice as likely to look for ‘fun’ online, than love (a partner). However, with so many people turning to online dating for such a variety of reasons, it’s clear that the activity is literally allowing people to carry their relationships around with them wherever they go.

Gender differences also come into play, articles on online dating. For example, men are much more likely than women to use online dating for sex (18% vs 5%), whereas men and women are equally as likely to be looking for new friends.

What people get up to when they’re dating online

While many different types of people go online to date – and they do articles on online dating for multiple reasons, our study also asked people about what they get up to when they are dating online, in order to understand the potential security implications.

It’s all in the profile

The profile is understandably a crucial part of online dating. It allows users to share snippets of their lives. It acts as a window, or a preview of a person, enticing others to reach out to them or find out more.

Is the profile crucial to the success of online dating? Yes. But is profile information secure? No. We found that a worrying number of online dating users are, through their profiles, placing sensitive information about themselves into the public domain, which could potentially lead them to harm if the information was to fall into the wrong hands.

For example, one-in-ten online dating users have shared their full home address publicly on their profile, have shared details about their work/ trade secrets, or personal details about their family in this way.

Many share photos of themselves or their loved ones this way – 15% using online dating have shared photos of their family publicly by displaying them on their profile and 17% have shared photos of their friends. Even more worryingly, one-in-ten (9%) have even shared intimate photos of themselves publicly on their profile, literally exposing themselves to the danger of having their precious or sensitive images mistreated by total strangers.

Matching up to danger

People tend to share their information even more willingly with matches and it doesn’t take long for online daters to be persuaded to part with personal information about themselves, articles on online dating, such as their home address or phone number.

People are more likely to give up information to those they have been ‘matched’ with in the online dating world – 16% give out personal details to matches, 15% tell matches embarrassing things about themselves and 14% provide their matches with private or unclothed photos of themselves. All of this information, in the wrong hands, can be used to track online dating users and their families online and offline, to crack their accounts by guessing passwords, for blackmail, and more. What’s more, this risky sharing happens faster than you might expect.

Giving out this information can mean that a relationship struck up online can enter the real world very quickly – with people going from being strangers, to being able to access an online dater’s home address or phoneline within a matter of minutes. That, articles on online dating, of course, is not always a safe or a good thing.

However, articles on online dating, there is a disparity between men and women. When it comes to personal information, men are ready to share information about themselves much faster than women are. Female users are likely to share information after several months (25% vs 16%), while men are significantly more likely to hand over their personal details after just minutes or hours (16% vs 9%).

Turn-offs

Despite the high proportion of people who use online dating services or apps, there are several factors that can put users off.

For example, one-in-ten users overall are worried about receiving malicious links or malware that articles on online dating their device and 9% are being put off by scammers that try to extort information or financial details from them. In both cases, entrepreneurs and self-employed online daters are the most worried about these threats, with 12% of this articles on online dating worried about malware and 15% concerned about scammers.

Overall, 9% are also put off online dating by people who send overly private or unclothed images, articles on online dating, and 7% are put off the activity when the information they share on dating services is used by others to harm them in some way. But coming across fake information – such as false photos (19%), fake relationship expectations (12%) and dishonest relationship statuses (11%) – was cited by respondents as the most common reason people are put off online dating services overall.

Faking it

People might turn to online dating for fun and to strike up new relationships, but ironically our study shows that a large number of people lie in the process, and this in itself is off-putting. 57% of online daters admitted they lie, most of whom (67%) turned out to be married men.

Among those that admitted they lie during online dating, articles on online dating, the most popular things to lie about include their names, marital status, location and appearance – such as by showing fake photos. Yet, those who ‘fake it’ are ironically the most likely to be put off online dating because of the amount of false articles on online dating they come across. Perhaps they don’t enjoy a taste of their own medicine? Either way, articles on online dating, people faking it is one of the most hated aspects of online dating.

So, why are people lying online? Our study offers up many reasons including one-in-ten online daters (11%) using fake accounts as a way to protect themselves from harm. But other reasons vary from people trying to catch their partners cheating, to trying to make themselves look better, or simply lying for the fun of it.

Safety articles on online dating. People’s concerns about dating online

With people lying for a variety of reasons online, safety, naturally, becomes something that we should question. You articles on online dating trust a stranger in the street who lies to you about themselves, so why should you let them into your digital life, or give them access to sensitive information about yourself?

With online dating so prevalent, users are clearly giving strangers access to their lives, which could perhaps be why those who date online have concerns about their online safety.

We found that vulnerable people such as the unemployed, and unmarried women, tend to be most concerned about meeting ‘people with bad intentions’ through articles on online dating online dating activities. Meanwhile, older age groups have slightly different concerns. 45-54 year olds, for example, tend to be concerned about the possibility of not being able to delete their information from online dating sites, and people aged 65+ are more concerned about fraud.

Overall though, some of the main concerns about dating online involve worries about data protection, with 61% of users being worried about their data being leaked from the dating service/app itself.

In addition, 63% are concerned about the device they use for online dating being infected by malware, demonstrating a heightened feeling of insecurity among the online dating community.

When it all goes wrong

Sometimes, people’s concerns about online dating do become a reality. After all, online dating, just like dating in the real-world, doesn’t always go to plan, and it can hurt when this happens.

Overall, 55% of people that date online have experienced some form of threat or problem – ranging from IT security incidents to meeting up with people that didn’t turn out to be who they claimed, articles on online dating, or being rejected by potential matches.

The data suggests that men put themselves at risk more than women. Twice as many male online daters said their device has been infected with malware, spyware or ransomware and 13% of men had been sent phishing emails that claimed to be from an online dating site, compared to just 7% of women.

In contrast, 15% of women said they had been involved in a conversation that made them feel uncomfortable compared to just 10% of men.

When it comes to occupations, business owners (19%) were the most likely to have had their device infected with malware or ransomware, while entrepreneurs or self-employed daters were most likely to have met someone who was not who they said they were.

People that date online also tend to conduct a higher proportion of other activities on the Internet, making them particularly vulnerable to the dangers of the online world – as well as to the ‘usual’ risks of dating or arranging to meet up with people they don’t know or trust. This is perhaps one of the reasons why people that use online dating websites are therefore twice as likely to experience an IT security incident than people that don’t (41% compared to 20%).

Looking in more detail at the IT security articles on online dating experienced by people that date online, there’s a wide range of things that can go wrong. For example, around one-in-three people that use online dating have had their device infected with malware or a virus compared to just 12% who don’t use online dating. In addition, around one-in-ten have had their device hacked, have had their data infected, shared, or become the victim of financial fraud.

Always use protection

So why are people that date online, experiencing more IT security problems than people that don’t? One obvious answer already touched upon is the fact that people involved in online dating do spend a lot of time online, and therefore might naturally come across more dangers than people who don’t. However, the study also shows that people are not protecting themselves properly when they are dating online.

Looking at the protection methods people put in place, just 36% use strong passwords to articles on online dating their information secure and only 27% use a security solution to help, leaving the majority exposed to risk. Worryingly, 16% do nothing to protect themselves at articles on online dating, because they do not see the risk.

Despite not doing much to help themselves, 55% say that strong security and privacy practices are important to them when they choose an online dating website, articles on online dating, service, or app, and only 12% do not know what security and privacy practices are. So, there is an awareness and certain level of concern about the dangers involved in online dating. This just needs to translate into action.

Conclusion: if you’re going to do it, do it safely

Today, articles on online dating, people are time-poor, and we rely on our digital devices to help us manage our schedules, our busy lives, and how we interact with others. Digital devices act as a window to the rest of the world, including our relationships.

This is even more the case where online dating is concerned. This form of striking up new relationships is entirely dependent on our digital platforms or smart devices. People are, because of online dating, literally carrying their dates around with them in their pockets.

While this comes with a large amount of convenience, it also comes with its own risks. Like any form of dating, meeting up with strangers isn’t always plain-sailing and this is also the case online. Online dating, indeed, requires the exchange of a certain level of information which, if placed in the wrong hands, can be misused.

Needless to say, our study has found that people that take part in online dating, are likely to share sensitive information with people they don’t know, or have only just met. What’s more, they share this data quickly. They are also at heightened risk of experiencing an IT security-related problem such as having their data leaked or exposed in some way. Yet, articles on online dating, they do little to protect themselves, with only one-in-three putting basic security measures in place such as using strong passwords or restraining themselves to sharing limited information about themselves online.

The boundary between online dating and the real world can very easily be blurred. Information about home addresses, once shared, can very quickly result in strangers turning up on doorsteps, personal information and sensitive photos can very easily turn into blackmail opportunities or put hacked accounts in the hands of cybercriminals.

Far from advising people to reduce their online dating activities, we simply would like to advise online daters to exercise caution, just like they would in the physical world. If you chose to date online, be careful not to click on unknown links that could be malicious, and try to avoid using insecure Wi-Fi hotspots where data can be intercepted by cybercriminals.

Furthermore, use protection in the form of a security solution and strong, hard-to-guess passwords, be savvy about how much data you give away and, importantly, look after the data you care about the most. That’s where Kaspersky Lab can help.

Источник: [https://torrent-igruha.org/3551-portal.html]

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *