MGTOW/MR-Men Going Their Own Way/Men Rights

Archives

Dating a mgtow guy

Posted on by -

dating a mgtow guy

As a woman who's spent a few years on Reddit, I'd like to discuss a recurring phenomenon I've noticed there. No, I'm not talking about. They're also likely to have lower median earnings; single men earned less in than in , even adjusting for inflation. Single women. alovex.co › lifeandstyle › aug › men-going-their-own-way-th.

Will not: Dating a mgtow guy

Dating a mgtow guy
Dating site in usa
DATING SINGLE MOM
HAITIAN WOMEN DATING

Dating a mgtow guy - life. There's

Men Going Their Own Way

Anti-feminist, misogynistic, mostly online male-separatist community

MGTOW logo as shown in episode "Men at War" of the BBC series Reggie Yates' Extreme UK

Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW) is an anti-feminist, misogynistic, mostly-online community advocating for men to separate themselves from women and from a society which they believe has been corrupted by feminism.[2] The community is a part of the manosphere, a collection of anti-feminist websites and online communities that also includes the men's rights movement, incels, and pickup artists.[3]

Like other manosphere communities, MGTOW overlaps with the alt-right and white supremacist movements,[4] and it has been implicated in online harassment of women.[5] The Southern Poverty Law Center categorizes MGTOW as a part of the male supremacist ideology.[6]

History

While it is not clear where the MGTOW ideology originated, it is believed to have emerged in the early s. A blog called No Ma'am was one of the first sites dedicated to the ideology, publishing a "MGTOW Manifesto" in Earlier members of MGTOW were largely libertarian. There is a divide between early and contemporary members of MGTOW, with some earlier members expressing derision for the present-day MGTOW community. There have been several prominent online MGTOW sites, including the subreddit r/MGTOW, created in , smaller auxiliary subreddits, and the MGTOW Forum, an independent website that emerged in Following Reddit's ban of a large incel subreddit, r/MGTOW was briefly the largest and most active manosphere forum on the site.

MGTOW communities and their fellow manosphere group, pick-up artists, began to merge with the alt-right when it came to prominence beginning in The two groups overlap both in membership and in ideology; both believe that feminism has destroyed Western society. MGTOW and other manosphere communities also overlap with various white supremacist, authoritarian, and populist movements alovex.co-right commentator and polemicistMilo Yiannopoulos is credited with helping to popularize MGTOW with a Breitbart article about "the Sexodus", in which he described men who were eschewing women, love, sex, and marriage because of feminism.

Researchers have implicated MGTOW communities in online harassment of women. In January a group of computer scientists published a preprint of a paper titled "The Evolution of the Manosphere Across the Web"; r/MGTOW and the MGTOW Forum were among the online communities which the authors said "have been growing in size and in their involvement in online harassment and real-world violence." The paper was described in MIT Technology Review as "the most complete picture yet of the misogynistic groups that fuel the incel movement online" and in Der Spiegel as "the most comprehensive attempt yet to analyze the manosphere online". Shortly after publication, Reddit quarantined r/MGTOW, a restriction the platform applies to subreddits determined to be "extremely offensive or upsetting to the average redditor" which prevents them from earning advertising revenue and requires visitors to agree to seeing potentially offensive content before entering. r/MGTOW was banned in August for breaking the site's policies against promotion of violence and hate.

Membership

Members of MGTOW communities are primarily heterosexual, white, middle-class men from North America and Europe. Unlike some other manosphere groups, MGTOW is exclusively male. MGTOW often disavow hierarchies and claim to be leaderless; some deny that MGTOW is a group or movement at all, instead emphasizing each member's individuality and independence within a collective.[18] Jones and colleagues writing in New Media & Society in describe the size of MGTOW communities: "while the precise number of MGTOW followers is unclear, it appears to be a popular and growing group within the Manosphere: the subreddit r/MGTOW has grown from 54, members in early to , members in early and there are 32, members listed on one MGTOW forum." Author Donna Zuckerberg described MGTOW in her book Not All Dead White Men as smaller than the men's human rights movement and the seduction (pickup artistry) communities, with the MGTOW Forum having over 25, subscribers and r/MGTOW having over 35,

Ideology

At the center of MGTOW ideology is the notion of male separatism and the belief that society has been corrupted by feminism. MGTOW groups are misogynist and anti-feminist, believing that feminism has made women dangerous to men, and that male self-preservation requires dissociating completely from women.[21] They believe there is systemic gynocentric bias against men, including double standards in gender roles and bias against men in family courts. MGTOW groups share a belief common among other manosphere groups that women follow a similar pattern in dating and marriage: young and attractive women are promiscuous and engage in "hypergamy", having sex with numerous men and abandoning a man if a "higher-value" man shows interest. They believe women gravitate towards "alpha men" who are attractive but mistreat them, and that this solidifies their beliefs in feminism. As the women begin to age, the MGTOW ideology explains that they choose to settle down with "beta males" who provide for them financially, but to whom they deny sex, sometimes choosing to have sex with attractive men outside of their marriage. Finally, the ideology holds that the women will divorce their husbands, and that courts will favor the women in divorce proceedings due to what they describe as female privilege.[22]

A paper in Information, Communication & Society stated that "MGTOW propagate extensive and wide-ranging passive or undirected harassment and misogyny on Twitter." Fellows at the Institute for Research on Male Supremacism publishing with the International Centre for Counter-Terrorism have said that members of MGTOW "openly disdain women, and normalize it through online harassment." The Southern Poverty Law Center categorizes MGTOW as a part of the male supremacist ideology,[6] a category they began tracking on their hate group tracking project, Hate Map, in

Men in the MGTOW community use jargon shared by the broader manosphere, including the red pill and blue pill metaphor borrowed from the film The Matrix. Those in the manosphere who have been awakened from feminist "delusion" to the supposed reality that society is fundamentally misandrist and dominated by feminist values are said to be "redpilled" or have "taken the red pill"; those who do not accept that ideology are referred to as "bluepilled".[26] Other jargon includes pejorative terms for other men such as "beta", "cuck", "soy boy", and "white knight".

Members of MGTOW communities track their engagement with the ideology on a series of four levels. At the first level, men believe they are used and manipulated by women (called "situational awareness" or the "red pill") but still believe in the value of marriage; they are sometimes described as "purple pilled".[30] At the second level, men reject long-term relationships, cohabitation, and marriage, but will still participate in shorter term relationships and sexual encounters.[31] At the third level, men reject short-term relationships and limit their interactions with women.[32] At the fourth level, men minimize their engagement with the state and society, including employment; this is called "going ghost".[note 1]

Relation to other manosphere groups

Main article: Manosphere

The MGTOW community is a part of the manosphere, a heterogeneous group of websites, blogs, and online forums promoting some forms of masculinity, hostility towards women, strong opposition to feminism, and exaggerated misogyny.[33] In addition to MGTOW, the men's rights movement, incels, pick-up artists, and father's rights movements also make up the manosphere.[34]

Men's rights movement

See also: Men's rights movement

Although some consider MGTOW to be a part of the men's rights movement, others have cited MGTOW's separatist ideology as distinguishing them from the men's rights movement, which engages in activism to try to drive societal change. According to Donna Zuckerberg, early MGTOW groups were primarily libertarian and opposed to "big government"; this led to a rift with the men's rights movements who wished to lobby for governmental change, particularly with regards to custody and divorce law.

Pickup artistry

See also: Pickup artist

The MGTOW community has a reciprocal disdain for pickup artists (PUAs) due to their differing opinions towards women. Whereas MGTOW focuses on separating entirely from women, pickup artists focus on developing techniques to have sex with women. PUA communities have mocked MGTOW as "Virgins Going Their Own Way". MGTOW communities deride PUAs as being entirely dependent on women's approval, and because they place so much value in attaining sexual success with women, MGTOW says PUA communities contribute to what they see as overvaluing of women in gynocentric society.

Notes

  1. ^The MGTOW Wiki divides social and economic disengagement into separate levels.

References

  1. ^Wright, Trott & Jones (), pp.&#;3–4; Nagle (), p.&#;94; Zuckerberg (), p.&#;19; Lin (), p.&#;78
  2. ^Hodapp (), p.&#;xviii; Jones, Trott & Wright (), p.&#;2; Ging (), p.&#;; Zuckerberg (), p.&#;18; Nagle (), p.&#;93
  3. ^Zuckerberg (), p.&#;19; Ging & Siapera (), p.&#;x
  4. ^Wright, Trott & Jones (), p.&#;2; Nagle (), pp.&#;18, 94; Ribeiro et al. (), p.&#;1
  5. ^ ab"Male Supremacy". Southern Poverty Law Center. Archived from the original on June 7,
  6. ^Wright, Trott & Jones (), p.&#;4; Lin (), pp.&#;91–92
  7. ^Wright, Trott & Jones (), pp.&#;3–4; Nagle (), p.&#;94; Zuckerberg (), p.&#;19; Lin (), p.&#;77; Hodapp (), pp.&#;xvii–xviii
  8. ^Lin (), pp.&#;88–89; Nagle (), pp.&#;95–97; Ging (), pp.&#;–; Van Valkenburgh (), p.&#;9; Zuckerberg (), p.&#;19
  9. ^Winter (), pp.&#;51–54; Lumsden (), p.&#;99; Ging (), p.&#;; Zuckerberg (), pp.&#;1–2, 12–13; Nagle (), pp.&#;93–94
  10. ^Lin (), p.&#;90; Nagle (), p.&#;94
  11. ^Hodapp (), p.&#;xviii; Lin (), p.&#;90; Nagle (), p.&#;94
  12. ^Hodapp (), p.&#;xviii; Lin (), p.&#;90
  13. ^Hodapp (), p.&#;xv; Lumsden (), pp.&#;98–99; Marwick & Lewis (), p.&#;13
  14. ^Jones, Trott & Wright (), p.&#;2; Nagle (), pp.&#;86–87; Zuckerberg (), p.&#;17

Works cited

  • Basu, Tanya (February 7, ). "The 'manosphere' is getting more toxic as angry men join the incels". MIT Technology Review.
  • Baumgärtner, Maik; Höfner, Roman; Müller, Ann-Katrin; Rosenbach, Marcel; Spiegel, Der (March 10, ). "Hatred Against Women: The Dark World of Extremist Misogyny". Der Spiegel. Retrieved March 25, : CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  • "Men at War". Reggie Yates' Extreme UK. Season 1. Episode 2. January 12, 22 minutes in. BBC. BBC Three.
  • Ging, Debbie (). "Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere". Men and Masculinities. 22 (4): – doi/X ISSN&#;X. S2CID&#;
  • Ging, Debbie; Siapera, Eugenia, eds. (). Gender Hate Online: Understanding the New Anti-Feminism. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. doi/ ISBN&#;. OCLC&#;
  • Hodapp, Christa (). Men's Rights, Gender, and Social Media. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books. ISBN&#;.
  • Janik, Rachel (April 24, ). ""I laugh at the death of normies": How incels are celebrating the Toronto mass killing". Hatewatch. Southern Poverty Law Center.
  • Jasser, Greta; Kelly, Megan; Rothermel, Ann-Kathrin (May 20, ). "Male supremacism and the Hanau terrorist attack: between online misogyny and far-right violence". International Centre for Counter-Terrorism Journal. International Centre for Counter-Terrorism.
  • Jones, Callum; Trott, Verity; Wright, Scott (). "Sluts and soyboys: MGTOW and the production of misogynistic online harassment". New Media & Society. 22 (10): – doi/ ISSN&#; S2CID&#;
  • Lin, Jie Liang (). "Antifeminism Online: MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way)". In Frömming, Urte Undine; Köhn, Steffen; Fox, Samantha; Terry, Mike (eds.). Digital Environments: Ethnographic Perspectives Across Global Online and Offline Spaces. Edition Medienwissenschaft. Transcript Verlag. pp.&#;77– ISBN&#;. JSTOR&#;alovex.co1xxrxw
  • Lumsden, Karen (). "'I Want to Kill You in Front of Your Children' Is Not a Threat. It's an Expression of a Desire': Discourses of Online Abuse, Trolling, and Violence on r/MensRights". In Lumsden, Karen; Harmer, Emily (eds.). Online Othering: Exploring Digital Violence and Discrimination on the Web. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. pp.&#;91– ISBN&#;.
  • Marwick, Alice; Lewis, Rebecca (May 15, ). Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online (Report). New York: Data & Society Research Institute. Retrieved June 13,
  • Nagle, Angela (). Kill All Normies: Online Culture Wars From 4Chan And Tumblr To Trump And The Alt-Right. Alresford, UK: Zero Books. ISBN&#;.
  • Ribeiro, Manoel Horta; Blackburn, Jeremy; Bradlyn, Barry; et&#;al. (January 21, ). "The Evolution of the Manosphere Across the Web". arXivv2 [alovex.co].
  • Schmitz, Rachel M.; Kazyak, Emily (). Robinson, Christine M.; Spivey, Sue (eds.). "Masculinities in Cyberspace: An Analysis of Portrayals of Manhood in Men's Rights Activist Websites". Social Sciences. 5 (2): doi/socsci
  • Thalen, Mikael (August 3, ). "Reddit bans notorious anti-feminist subreddit 'Men Going Their Own Way'". The Daily Dot. Retrieved August 4,
  • Van Valkenburgh, Shawn P. (December 4, ). "Digesting the Red Pill: Masculinity and Neoliberalism in the Manosphere". Men and Masculinities. 24: 84– doi/X ISSN&#;X.
  • Winter, Aaron (). "Online Hate: From the Far-Right to the 'Alt-Right' and from the Margins to the Mainstream". In Lumsden, Karen; Harmer, Emily (eds.). Online Othering: Exploring Digital Violence and Discrimination on the Web. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. pp.&#;39– ISBN&#;.
  • Wright, Scott; Trott, Verity; Jones, Callum (). "'The pussy ain't worth it, bro': assessing the discourse and structure of MGTOW". Information, Communication & Society. 23 (6): – doi/X ISSN&#;X. S2CID&#;
  • Zuckerberg, Donna (). Not All Dead White Men: Classics and Misogyny in the Digital Age. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN&#;. OCLC&#;

Further reading

External links

  • The dictionary definition of MGTOW at Wiktionary
Источник: [alovex.co]
Fearless LIVE" width="" height="" src="alovex.co?feature=oembed" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen>

Introduction

Level of Consciousness (Red Pill, Blue Pill, and MGTOW.

Exploring one&#;s masculine energy & potential (Releasing)

Balancing feminine and masculine energy

Is it possible to get sex without lust?

Masculine energy

How to be more dominant

How to attract sweethearts

Is it possible to be masculine while being emotive and playful or dynamic in expression?

How do you recognize time wasters?

The difference between intuition and a reaction to a trauma trigger

When you reveal more CAP feelings, is it normal for AGFLAP to amplify in contrast to them?

How to handle your family when they are not understanding you being in a CAP state

Interpretation on impatience

How to understand women&#;s emotional talk

How do you mature?

The 21st century can feel like a minefield when it comes to dating and relationships. There are multiple approaches and suggestions of what someone should do in their life, making it very hard for men to know what they want and where they want to be. This video discusses how to navigate the confusing world of women and relationships &#; breaking through this confusion into a more confident state, attracting AMAZING, BEAUTIFUL, AND CONFIDENT women instead of time-wasters. It also reveals the main differences between The FEARLESS Approach and that of the red pill movement, MGTOW, and more traditional people who like feminine women.

Источник: [alovex.co]

Being a man in the 21st century is hard. Modern dating, society, and women are changing faster than ever before. And this is leaving men confused. They don&#;t know which path to take when it comes to women and relationships.

Modern Dating

This has fueled movements such as the “Red Pill” community and MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) who blame women for their problems rather than looking internally &#; but for those who do want to get better with women, how do you navigate the dating world that at times feels like a minefield?

&#;The old-school way of dating doesn&#;t work anymore.&#; What does that mean? When it comes to dating women, there are so many different opinions on how to deal with women. You have the red pill vs blue pill debate, which has spawned the MGTOW movement. And then you also have men who want to date traditional women, others who just want casual sex, and everything in between. It can seem hard to know what approach is right for you.

Current State of Dating

In this video, Brian discusses the answers on how to break through the dating confusion and frustration with women so that you can finally start living your life without fear of loneliness and fear of rejection.

What Is MGTOW?

If you&#;ve never heard of MGTOW, it is a growing group of men that believe the deck is stacked against their sex. You can look at it from any number of perspectives &#; males are the overwhelming victims of suicides, violent deaths, homelessness, they are liable to pay half of their money upon divorce, and may not even have the chance to see their children, just to name a few.

So, if society doesn’t take care of them, these Men Go Their Own Way. They forego marriage, or relationships with females of any kind, and refuse to let society bully them.

The idea is to close themselves off from the pain, engage in their own interests, and interact as little as possible with the noxious influences outside. They view society itself as “gynocentric”, where everything is done in service of the female, and males are viewed as disposable items to be used in the pursuit of that goal.

I agree with some of their points, the antagonism between the genders in various countries is untenable. But the keyword in the previous sentence is “in various countries”, which implies that in many others it isn’t the case. 

If you have a more global perspective, overseas dating can solve the MGTOW reasons for despondency.

How MGTOW Can Expand Their Perspective

The MGTOW has supposedly swallowed “the red pill”, so named after that scene in the Matrix wherein the protagonist is offered a blue pill that erases his memories from reality, or the red pill that makes him permanently aware of the truth.

But here’s the thing, you don’t see movements like MGTOW in most countries outside the West. The one notable exception perhaps being the “sōshoku-kei danshi”, or “herbivore men” in Japan.

To make a long story short, “herbivore men” are men who reject the “salaryman” culture; wherein Japanese men are expected to sacrifice their life in favor of a company where they’ll be permanent employees to a single entity that will likely work them to death. 

This rejection happens at the social level as well. Given their loss in status, they otherwise don’t pursue romantic relationships or find it worth the bother. In , single Japanese men were questioned on the phenomenon and it was determined that  61% of men in their 20s and 70% of men in their 30s considered themselves to be “herbivores”.

Other than that, the West is alone in having such movements. If the red pill truly represented the uncontroversial truth, it would be far more widespread.

To me, it would seem like both the cultural and economic forces simply create an environment that facilitates this type of behavior and status quo. It’s not a universal truth of the human condition.

The easiest solution to this problem reminds me of a bad joke you sometimes hear doctors say:

“Doctor, doctor, it hurts when I move my arm like this!” says a patient with a cast on one arm and pained expression as he lifts up his arm. 

“Well, stop moving it like that then!” the doctor responds exasperated. 

MGTOW does identify some injustices and cultural trends, but its prescription for the malady is wrong. Rather than try to make the best out of a bad circumstance, why not simply change the situation entirely?

If your arm hurts, then just use the other one. If your dating and day-to-day life suck where you are, then go to a place where it doesn’t.

That’s what the MGTOW philosophy doesn’t understand. They look out of their window and assume the whole world is like their limited point of view.

But here’s something interesting &#; according to psychological research, the average person can have close connections with other people at one time. This phenomenon is known as “Dunbar’s Number”. 

This is because our brains evolved in tribes of roughly that size. For , years, those people were almost the entirety of our world, until we began creating villages and then cities. 

However, we’re still programmed to make inferences based on what society is like according to whom we hang out with. In the wider social framework, this is barely statistically relevant. 

Even if every single person in your social network has a certain characteristic, it hardly matters when we’re talking about the behavior of millions or even billions of people. Birds of a feather, flock together.

The world is much, much bigger than you subconsciously think it is. 

That’s why a political candidate can win and you will hear people say, “I don’t even know anyone who voted for them”.

Extend this framework, not only within a country but into a global perspective and you have an infinite amount of configurations for those people.

You are the average of the people closest to you. Do not be around people who define themselves through their pain and struggles, find people who characterize themselves through their goals, dreams, and how they overcome obstacles. 

Run Toward a Dream, Not Away From Pain

MGTOW Run Toward a Dream Not Away From Pain

If you want to be happier, don&#;t focus on what&#;s wrong. Run toward all that&#;s good.

By all means have standards of what you are willing to tolerate, but do something with that anger when the line is crossed.

Use your energy to go and explore new horizons and alternatives. Perhaps, yes, the dating market is bad in the United States.

But it’s not awful in Eastern Europe or Asia, where the sexes are not at war with each other. They mutually complement and balance each other, as it should be. 

The MGTOW philosophy, alongside groups like angry libertarians ranting about government injustices and waste, may have valid concerns. But so what?

You are but a single person. Even if you sacrifice your life to enact change, it’s unlikely that you will be able to change the civilizational inertia guiding these trends.

Rather than being bitter, instead of living in a society that you inherently disagree with, why not go where you are treated best?

Almost a decade and a half ago, my dissatisfaction with my circumstances led me down a path that changed my life. 

Originally, I just wanted to find people with whom I had a genuine connection. But slowly, I began to realize that being abroad had a host of benefits beyond just overseas dating.

Once you are no longer bound to one area, you can not only pick and choose whom you interact with on the social level, but also at the societal level. I can now look at what the governments of the world are offering and decide to become a citizen there based on whether their policies would suit me from a legal and tax perspective. 

MGTOW Should GWYTB

Whenever I mention that I have a wife on my YouTube channel, there’s usually a portion of the comments saying they can’t wait for the divorce or similar horrible things.

I pity them, I truly do, because they’re so filled with hate that they are determined that others feel their same misery so that they don’t feel like something is missing in their lives. These people cannot be at peace if anyone else has found joy.

If they don’t get out of their cycle of hate, these individuals will never achieve anything or find happiness. Hate begets hate. If you believe you cannot change your world, you will always subject yourself to paralyzing feelings of helplessness.

Yes, you are but one person, you cannot change the sweeping normalcy that is the culture and legal system of a country. But why would you try to?

There is no reason to be a martyr. 

You don&#;t have to change the world, just your world.

There is good out there, you just need to be willing to give life a chance. Don’t identify with the pain, identify with hope.

There are billion people in the world and countries to choose from &#; all with their unique history, cultures, and regulation. By staying in one place, it’s like reading the first page of a novel, over and over, while complaining about the fact that nothing changes.

Yes, nothing is different, but because you didn’t allow it to change. If you venture out into the unknown and find a place you can call home, then all the MGTOW reasons, or any other fringe ideology you hold that drove you to embrace pain and misery as a default, will seem pointless. 

I’m telling you as someone who lived through similar frustrations as yourself &#; go where you&#;re treated best (GWYTB) and live life on your own terms. You won’t regret it. 

Andrew Henderson

Andrew Henderson

Andrew Henderson is the world's most sought-after consultant on international tax planning, investment immigration, and global citizenship. He has personally lived this lifestyle for over a decade, and now works with seven- and eight-figure entrepreneurs and investors who want to "go where they're treated best".

Andrew Henderson

Latest posts by Andrew Henderson (see all)

Last updated: Oct 21, at PM

Источник: [alovex.co]

Out on the wilder shores of the manosphere, they talk constantly about the red pill and the blue pill. Derived from a scene in The Matrix, taking the blue pill lets you live your life in blissful ignorance of the monstrous reality of the wicked world, while necking the red pill opens your eyes to reveal the awful truth. Dream world or real world: it’s your choice. As rebel leader Morpheus (Laurence Fishburne) explained it to Neo (Keanu Reeves) in , “You take the blue pill, the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill, you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.”

But out in the manosphere – far too often a digital sewer for 50, shades of misogyny – “taking the red pill” means that a guy has opened his eyes to the “bitter truth” about women. Namely: women are not simply pieces of meat; women are pieces of poisoned meat and they will lie about you, end your career, suck your bank account dry, wreck your life and send you to a cell with some other blameless soul that got on the wrong side of the sisters, like that nice Harvey Weinstein. “The red pill represents a new phase in online misogyny,” wrote Donna Zuckerberg, author of Not All Dead White Men. Red-pill believers, says Zuckerberg, “not only mock and belittle women; they also believe that in our society men are oppressed by women”.

From the incels (involuntary celibates) to the PUAs (pick-up artists), nobody on the manosphere is quite as obsessed with the red-pill concept as the boys in MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way), who aspire to live their lives without contact with women. The MGTOW (pronounced “mig-tau”) who achieve total enlightenment are said to be “going monk”, which does what it says on the tin. Going monk is the black belt in giving up women.

Some MGTOW have platonic relationships with women, while others keep transactions strictly commercial, with sex workers. But what you notice about all of them is that they never stop talking about women. Men sharing their lives with girlfriends, wives and daughters never devote this much time to thinking, talking and obsessing about women. At first glance, the official Men Going Their Own Way website (alovex.co) looks like a cross between a trailer for an action movie and a cry for help. “Ejecting silly preconceptions and cultural definitions of what a man is,” promises the MGTOW mission statement, “refusing to bow, serve and kneel for the opportunity to be treated like a disposable utility.” Fair enough. And for a moment you can imagine a digital universe where men are uplifted by sharing the secrets of their soul. But it took, oh, about 90 seconds for MGTOW to turn this brother’s stomach. “Put a bitch in her place?” asks one forum. “Unleash the beef.”

In this culture of dread between the sexes, we all lose

Источник: [alovex.co]

Pew Research Center conducted this study to understand Americans’ attitudes toward and personal experiences with dating and relationships. These findings are based on a survey conducted Oct. , , among 4, U.S. adults. This includes those who took part as members of Pew Research Center’s American Trends Panel (ATP), an online survey panel that is recruited through national, random sampling of residential addresses, as well as respondents from the Ipsos KnowledgePanel who indicated that they identify as lesbian, gay or bisexual (LGB).

Recruiting ATP panelists by phone or mail ensures that nearly all U.S. adults have a chance of selection. This gives us confidence that any sample can represent the whole U.S. adult population (see our Methods explainer on random sampling). To further ensure that each ATP survey reflects a balanced cross-section of the nation, the data are weighted to match the U.S. adult population by gender, race, ethnicity, partisan affiliation, education and other categories.

For more, see the report’s methodology about the project. You can also find the questions asked, and the answers the public provided, in this topline.

Partnered adults are those who say they are currently married, living with a partner or in a committed romantic relationship.

Single or unpartnered adults are those who say they are currently not married, living with a partner or in a committed romantic relationship. A small share of single adults report that they are casually dating someone.

Daters, single-and-looking and on the dating market all indicate that someone is currently not married, living with a partner or in a committed romantic relationship and has indicated that they are looking for a committed romantic relationship only, casual dates only or either a committed romantic relationship or casual dates.

Not dating, not looking, non-daters or not on the dating market means someone is not married, living with a partner or in a committed romantic relationship and has indicated that they are not currently looking for a relationship or dates.

Relationship, committed relationship and committed romantic relationship are used interchangeably.

Casually dating someone refers to single adults who say they are currently casually dating someone – regardless of whether they say they are looking for a committed romantic relationship, casual dates or neither.

LGB is sometimes used as a shorthand for adults who identify as lesbian, gay or bisexual, regardless of the sex of their partner, if they are partnered.

Online dating users or online daters refer to the 30% of respondents in this survey who answered yes to the following question: “Have you ever used an online dating site or dating app?”

References to White and Black adults include only those who are non-Hispanic and identify as only one race. Hispanics are of any race. The views and experiences of Asian Americans are not analyzed separately in this report due to sample limitations. Data for Asian Americans and other racial and ethnic groups are incorporated into the general population figures throughout the report.

References to college graduates or people with a college degree comprise those with a bachelor’s degree or more education. Some college includes those with an associate degree and those who attended college but did not obtain a degree. High school refers to those who have a high school diploma or its equivalent, such as a General Education Development (GED) certificate.

All references to party affiliation include those who lean toward that party. Republicans include those who identify as Republicans and independents who say they lean toward the Republican Party, and Democrats include those who identify as Democrats and independents who say they lean toward the Democratic Party.

References to those living in urban, suburban and rural areas are based on respondents’ answer to the following question: “How would you describe the community where you currently live? (1) urban, (2) suburban, (3) rural.”

Most daters say their dating lives aren’t going well and it’s difficult to find people to dateAs more Americans turn to online dating and the #MeToo movement leaves its imprint on the dating scene, nearly half of U.S. adults – and a majority of women – say that dating has become harder in the last 10 years.

Among those who are on the dating market – the 15% of American adults who are single and looking for a committed relationship or casual dates – most say they are dissatisfied with their dating lives and that it has been difficult to find people to date, according to a Pew Research Center survey conducted in October

Other publications from this survey

While single-and-looking men and women report equal levels of dissatisfaction with their dating lives and the ease of finding people to date, women are more likely to say they have had some particularly negative experiences. Most women who are currently single and looking to date (65%) say they have experienced at least one of six harassing behaviors asked about in the survey from someone they were dating or had been on a date with, such as being touched in a way that made them uncomfortable or rumors being spread about their sexual history. This compares with 50% of men who are single and looking. The pattern holds when looking at all women and men, whether they are currently on the dating market or not.

Women are also more likely to see risk – both physical and emotional – when it comes to dating. When those who say dating has become harder for most people in the last 10 years are asked to describe in their own words why they think this is the case, women are twice as likely as men to cite increased risk. For their part, men are more likely than women to say technology is a reason dating has gotten harder. Overall, 47% of Americans say dating is now harder than it was 10 years ago, while 19% say it’s easier and 33% say it’s about the same.

Long-distance relationships, debt and voting for Donald Trump top list of relationship deal breakersSingles who are looking for a relationship are generally open to dating people with many different traits and from a variety of backgrounds. For example, large majorities say they would consider a relationship with someone of a different religion or different race or ethnicity than them. Most also say they would seriously date someone who makes significantly more or significantly less money than them. When it comes to being in a relationship with someone who lives far away, has a significant amount of debt, or who voted for Donald Trump, however, many of those who are looking for a relationship would hesitate.

The nationally representative survey of 4, U.S. adults was conducted online Oct. , – before the coronavirus pandemic shook the dating landscape – using Pew Research Center’s American Trends Panel.

Among the other key findings:

Most Americans say it’s harder for men to know how to behave on dates in the era of the #MeToo movement

The public sees challenges for men dating in the era of #MeToo A majority of the overall public (65%) says the increased focus on sexual harassment and assault in the last few years has made it harder for men to know how to interact with someone they’re on a date with. About a quarter (24%) say it hasn’t made much difference, and 9% say it has become easier for men to know how to behave. Fewer people think this focus on harassment and assault has made it harder for women to know how to interact with someone they’re on a date with (43%), while 38% say it hasn’t made much difference for women.

Men – especially older men – and Republicans are more likely than women and Democrats to say it’s harder for men to know how to act when dating in the era of the #MeToo movement, though majorities across the board express this view. For example, 75% of men ages 50 and older say it is now harder for men to know how to behave on dates, compared with 63% of men younger than 50, 58% of women younger than 50 and 63% of women 50 and older.

Premarital sex is largely seen as acceptable, but most view sex on a first date and open relationships as taboo

Most Americans say premarital sex is at least sometimes acceptable Most adults (65%) say sex between unmarried adults in a committed relationship is acceptable at least sometimes, including 43% who say this is always acceptable. Casual sex between consenting adults who are not in a committed relationship is also seen as generally acceptable (62%). About half (49%) say it is acceptable for consenting adults to exchange explicit images of themselves.

When it comes to open relationships – that is, a committed relationship where both people agree that it is acceptable to date or have sex with other people – the public is less accepting. Some 32% think this can be acceptable at least sometimes (regardless of whether they would do it themselves), while 48% say open relationships are never acceptable. Having sex on a first date is also still seen as taboo by some. While 30% say it can be acceptable under some or all circumstances, 42% say it is never acceptable.

Younger adults are more likely to see these dating norms as acceptable – sometimes dramatically so. For example, 70% of to year-olds say consenting adults exchanging explicit images of themselves can be acceptable at least sometimes, compared with just 21% of those ages 65 and older. Lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) adults also tend to be more accepting of these norms than their straight counterparts. In fact, LGB adults are the only demographic group studied in which a majority said that open relationships are always or sometimes acceptable (61% vs. 29% of straight adults).

Vast majorities say that breaking up through technology is mostly unacceptable, and few say they would ‘ghost’ someone

Breaking up in person is largely seen as the only acceptable way to end a committed relationshipDespite concerns that Americans’ rising dependence on communicating through technology would lead to more impersonal breakups through devices, most agree that breaking up in person is the way to go. The vast majority of adults say that it is always or sometimes acceptable for a person to break up with a committed romantic partner in person (97%). About half (51%) say it is at least sometimes acceptable to break up over the phone – though only 10% say this is always acceptable. Far fewer say it can be acceptable to break up through a text message (14%), email (14%) or private message on a social media site (11%). In fact, most say it is never acceptable to end committed relationships through those forms of technology. The shares are strikingly similar when it comes to breaking up with someone a person is casually dating rather than in a committed relationship with.

The survey also asked those who are single and looking for a relationship or dates how they would let someone know they didn’t want to go out with them again after a first date. Only 8% say they would ghost someone (cut off communication). About half (52%) say they wouldn’t take the initiative to reach out but would let the other person know if they got in touch. The remaining share (40%) say they would contact the other person to let them know. Single-and-looking men are evenly split on whether they would proactively let the other person know if they didn’t want to go out again after the first date (47%) or wait for the other person to contact them before letting them know (47%). A majority of single-and-looking women (59%), on the other hand, would respond if the other person got in touch first, while 30% say they would proactively reach out and let the other person know.

Single people overall report that they don’t feel much pressure from society and the people they know to find a partner

Most single people don’t feel a lot of pressure to find a partnerMost single people (including both those on and off the dating market) say they don’t feel a lot of pressure to find a partner from their friends, family or society in general. About two-in-ten (22%) say they feel at least some pressure from friends, while 31% say the same about family members and 37% say they feel society is pressuring them.

Feeling pressure to be in a committed relationship is highly dependent on age. Younger singles feel much more pressure from each source. For example, 53% of single to year-olds say there is at least some pressure from society to find a partner, compared with 42% of to year-olds, 32% of to year-olds and 21% of those ages 65 and older. In fact, a majority of singles 65 and older – the vast majority of whom are widowed or divorced, in contrast to young singles who are mostly never married – say they feel no pressure at all from each of these sources.

Single women and men give different reasons for difficulty finding people to date

Women say it’s hard to find someone who is looking for the same kind of relationship and meets their standardsDaters who had difficulty finding people to date in the past year were asked about some of the possible reasons that might be the case. Among these daters, the most common explanations include the challenge of finding someone who is looking for the same type of relationship (53% say this is a major reason), difficulty in approaching people (46%) and trouble finding someone who meets their expectations (43%).

There are large differences by gender on this topic. Single-and-looking women are far more likely than single-and-looking men to say that trouble finding someone who was looking for the same kind of relationship or who meets their expectations are major reasons they’ve had difficulty. In turn, men are much more likely than women to say difficulty approaching people is a major reason.

Roughly one-in-ten partnered adults met their partners online, but this is far more common among some groups

Partnered LGB adults are far more likely than their straight counterparts to have met their partner online A plurality of those who are married, living with a partner or in a committed romantic relationship say they first met their spouse or partner through friends or family (32%). Smaller shares say they met through work (18%) or school (17%), and still fewer met their partner online (12%).

While relatively small shares of partnered adults first met their partner online, some groups are more likely to have done so. About one-in-five partnered adults ages 18 to 29 (21%) say they met their partner online, compared with 15% or fewer among their older counterparts. And LGB adults are far more likely to have first met their partner online than straight adults (28% vs. 11%).

Overall, three-in-ten adults say they have used an online dating site or app, and a majority (57%) of those users say their experiences with online dating were positive. Most also say it was easy to find people they were physically attracted to and who shared their hobbies and interests.

Online dating isn’t the only way Americans are using the internet to help them navigate the dating scene. About four-in-ten adults (38%) say they have searched for information online about someone they were romantically interested in. This is especially common among young adults: 64% of those younger than age 30 say they have done this.

Half of single adults – and a majority of single women – are not on the dating market

Half of singles are not looking for relationship or datesFully half of single adults say they are not currently looking for a relationship or dates. Among those who are on the dating market, about half are open to either a committed relationship or casual dates.

Single men are far more likely than single women to be looking for a relationship or dates – 61% vs. 38%. This gender gap is especially apparent among older singles.

Among singles who are not looking to date, having more important priorities right now and just enjoying the single life are among the most common reasons cited. Non-daters younger than age 50 are particularly likely to say they have more important priorities at the moment.

Defining who is partnered, who is single and who is a ‘dater’

 

Источник: [alovex.co]

Reddit’s Female Dating Strategy offers women advice — and a strict rulebook for how to act

A woman recently went to Reddit for advice: her fiancé had financially ruined her due to a gambling addiction, and she wasn’t sure what to do. Members of Female Dating Strategy, a subreddit offering dating advice exclusively to women, spotted the thread and added their own assessment: her choice to stay with him was another example of “cockholm syndrome.”

On a website commonly known as the home of the manosphere, r/FemaleDatingStrategy is, in many ways, initially, refreshing. The “female-only” forum, founded in February , prides itself on being the only space on Reddit for women who date men to safely vent concerns about their relationships with men who often devalue them, ignore them, or even abuse them. It’s filled with memes and advice, and a recent Wall Street Journal piece praised it for offering “honesty and tough love.” The subreddit has 54, subscribers and is growing rapidly.

But while FDS’s advice can seem appealing at first, underneath is a socially conservative approach that’s often deeply critical of women and their behaviors, placing limits on how they can act and what they ought to seek from a relationship.

On a base level, much of Female Dating Strategy’s advice makes sense. For women who have dealt with trauma at the hands of men in their relationships, FDS’s guidelines (“A Man MUST Treat You Like a Queen from the Start” and “Don’t Settle for Less”) can serve as a practice in boundary-setting, and the forum can offer a supportive community for those who may not otherwise have one. Many FDS members talk about how FDS changed their lives. One user said FDS helped them block a manipulative guy they’d been seeing for years; another said the community helped her leave an abusive relationship. Much of the basic advice in FDS can be helpful in learning one’s worth and relearning how to assert boundaries as an adult.

It’s clear that Female Dating Strategy can have an appeal to women trying to find answers to the struggles in their relationships. “The guidelines helped me realize (what in hindsight sounds obvious) that if the guys you are talking to aren’t choosing to reciprocate the same effort as you in the beginning it’s not going to get better,” said a friend who introduced me to the group.

Dedicated members of Female Dating Strategy are supposed to read the subreddit’s six-point ideology around how to approach dating, follow its list of rules (they do not support consensual BDSM, viewing porn, or having sex before commitment has been established in a relationship), and use women-critical lingo such as “pickmeisha” (a woman who lowers standards to receive attention from men) and “cockholm syndrome” (when a woman keeps going back to “low-value” men). There are even approved podcasters and YouTubers for FDS members to listen to.

The sexual conservatism of their approach can become oppressive to women. Women are encouraged to not disclose their sexual history to partners or have sex too soon because they believe no man would ever love a woman who has sex quickly. Posts about sex workers can be incredibly whorephobic (a term used by sex workers to describe hatred toward sex workers that can be both relational, systemic, and societal), with comments on one post saying that abusive men should see sex workers instead of “normal women.” My friend who otherwise enjoys FDS says she doesn’t like “how they talk about sex workers or treat them as separate from the general population of women.” And just as the forum breaks men down into “low value” and “high value,” so too will it call women “low value” for behavior that doesn’t live up to their standards.

These strict rules mean that FDS members only support certain women. When one commenter wrote that they love FDS and are dating a High Value Male but they enjoy BDSM, some people responded that FDS may not be the space for them if they can’t follow the rules. Another post says that a woman who wants to ask men out (instead of waiting for him to initiate like a High Value Male would) makes them “a pick-me” automatically. Women who choose to propose to their boyfriends are similarly mocked on FDS. The subreddit also deletes posts that “don’t follow our principles.” So women who don’t follow FDS’s strict ideology are very quickly pushed out by moderators.

Similar conservative guidelines (“don’t rush into sex,” “let him take the lead”) were promoted as dating advice in books of the ’90s and s such as The Rules: Time-Tested Secrets for Capturing the Heart of Mr. Right. Female Dating Strategy even has a page dedicated to FDS-approved dating books. These dating advice books and FDS mirror generally repressive norms about women’s sexuality, but they’re specifically about women policing other women’s behavior in the name of winning a man.

The site also echoes a brand of anti-porn feminism that reaches back to the s and s’ Feminist Sex Wars. Sex-positive feminists argued for, as author Gayle Rubin put it, the “decriminalization of sexuality and for all consenting persons to do what they wished sexually.” Their opponents argued that porn, BDSM, and sex work were inherently oppressive and degrading to women. But by denying women autonomy over their bodies and sexual choices, they often ended up dehumanizing women who didn’t live up to their moral standards.

The Verge reached out to Female Dating Strategy’s moderation team for comment. The moderators said they would only speak to us if we provided “valid government issued ID” as proof of identity, which we declined to do, and they declined or did not respond to other offers for verification.

FDS’s approach to dating shares some behaviors with traditionally male and radical relationship subreddits. Like pickup artists, Female Dating Strategy often objectifies the opposite gender and turns dating into some sort of game to be won — just in their case, it isn’t having sex that’s the prize, but finding a High Value Male. Both communities often will blame women for the ways men treat them, and an FDS “strategy coach” even reworked the infamous Pickup Artist guide The Book of Pook for FDS’s audience by “converting the sexist stuff.” FDS also had to activelyphase out femcel language (that’s a women’s “incel” community) because it was scaring people away from their new ideology.

In recent months, the community r/AgainstHateSubreddits has called out FDS on multiple occasions for banning trans women. When reading about FDS’s history of transphobic policies and behavior, they commented, “I joined it recently because some friend told me I should, but I’m gonna leave it right away.”

Day to day, the subreddit continues to fill with screenshots of funny tweets and inspirational quotes — images that are easy to get sucked in by and keep scrolling past. Those looking for true advice, though, will find something far more judgmental. When one woman recently asked another relationship subreddit how to help her boyfriend with erectile dysfunction, FDS spotted the thread and chimed in. With the tag “dump his ass,” an FDS poster assessed the situation: “Pickmeisha wasting her time with small dicked dude with ED.”

Источник: [alovex.co]

Being a man in the 21st century is hard. Modern dating, society, and women are changing faster than ever before. And this is leaving men confused. They don&#;t know which path to take when it comes to women and relationships.

Modern Dating

This has fueled movements such as the “Red Pill” community and MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) who blame women for their problems rather than looking internally &#; but for those who do want to get better with women, how do you navigate the dating world that at times feels like a minefield?

&#;The old-school way of dating doesn&#;t work anymore.&#; What does that mean? When it comes to dating women, there are so many different opinions on how to deal with women. You have the red pill vs blue pill debate, which has spawned the MGTOW movement. And then you also have men who want to date traditional women, others who just want casual sex, and everything in between. It can seem hard to know what approach is right for you.

Current State of Dating

In this video, Brian discusses the answers on how to break through the dating confusion and frustration with women so that you can finally start living your life without fear of loneliness and fear of rejection.

Introduction

Level of Consciousness (Red Pill, Blue Dating a mgtow guy, and MGTOW.

Exploring one&#;s masculine energy & potential (Releasing)

Balancing feminine and masculine energy

Is it possible to get sex without lust?

Masculine energy

How to be more dominant

How to attract sweethearts

Is it possible to be masculine while being emotive and playful or dynamic in expression?

How do you recognize time wasters?

The difference between intuition dating a south american girl a reaction to a trauma trigger

When you reveal more CAP feelings, is it normal for AGFLAP to amplify in contrast to them?

How to handle your family when they are not understanding you being in a CAP state

Interpretation on impatience

How to understand women&#;s emotional talk

How do you mature?

The 21st century can feel like a minefield when it comes to dating and relationships. There are multiple approaches and suggestions of what someone should do in their life, dating a mgtow guy it very hard for men to know what they want and where they want to be. This video discusses how to navigate the confusing world of women and relationships &#; breaking through this confusion into a more confident state, attracting AMAZING, BEAUTIFUL, AND CONFIDENT women instead of time-wasters. It also reveals the main differences between The FEARLESS Approach and that of the red pill movement, MGTOW, and more traditional people who like feminine women.

Источник: [alovex.co]

Men going their own way: the rise of a toxic male separatist movement

‘There has been an awakening … changing the world … one man at a time.” These are the dramatic dating a mgtow guy that appear when you visit alovex.co In a video that looks a lot like an action-movie trailer, the words are soon followed by five more that appear to smash through the screen, smouldering fiery red: “Men … going … their … own way.”

If you stumbled across this website and had never heard of “men going their own way” (MGTOW) before, you would probably assume this was a tiny, extreme movement. But you would be only half right.

The views of MGTOW are indeed unorthodox, even within the sprawling web of groups, lifestyles and cults known as the “manosphere”, where women-haters mobilise against a supposed gynocratic conspiracy. While incels plot violent revenge on women, and pickup artists (PUAs) deploy predatory tactics to “game” women into having sex with them, the men of the MGTOW attempt to eschew relationships with women altogether. They are, literally, going their own way. Far, far away from any women, dating a mgtow guy. At all.

Although some MGTOW maintain platonic relationships with women and others have one-night stands or visit sex workers, many prefer to abstain from sex, a process referred to as “going monk”. This is too much for some members of the wider manosphere. The blogger Matt Forney, notorious for posts such as “Why dating a mgtow guy girls don’t deserve to be loved” and “The necessity of domestic violence”, wrote that “men going their own way is no way for men to go” and mocked MGTOW as “a cult for lonely virgins”.

But this isn’t an obscure internet cul-de-sac; alovex.co alone has almost 33, members. Its forums (“for men only”) contain conversations on more than 50, topics, senior dating app more thanreplies, which range from advice on divorcing as cheaply as possible to lurid stories about women who have found particularly inventive ways to murder their husbands. The site also lists 25 video channels; between them, these have more thanfollowers, and their videos have been viewed a total of m times.

Over on YouTube, one of the best-known MGTOW vloggers, who goes by the name of Sandman, has racked up more 90m views for videos with titles ranging from “Smart men don’t get married” to “Criticise her and she will destroy your career”.

The MGTOW philosophy is elaborately laid out on the alovex.co website, dating a mgtow guy, which summarises it as “a statement of self-ownership, where the modern man preserves and protects his own sovereignty above all else”. Drawing on snippets of quotes and newspaper clippings, the site dating a mgtow guy that MGTOW dates back to great men, including Schopenhauer, Beethoven, Galileo and “even Jesus Christ”.

Women are essentially portrayed as parasites riding on the coattails of men, who have, throughout history, been responsible for “far greater miracles of science, discovery and human endeavour”. By shaking women off, it is explained, men will be free to pursue ever higher achievements.

“I love this! I feel like I found the secret to the universe,” a user comments in alovex.co’s testimonials section. Another writes that his city has become so “ultra-feminised” that things are “mind-blowingly bad for men here, especially straight white men”.

Elsewhere, philosophy and opinion are mixed with a heavy dose of often deeply misogynistic advice, such as this from the FAQs section of a different MGTOW website: “My girlfriend is pregnant. What do I do?” “Whatever you do, do NOT invite her into the hot tub with champagne to ‘celebrate’, dating a mgtow guy. This can cause a miscarriage and she could lose the baby! Repeat: You should not under any circumstances do that … as quickly as possible.”

It is impossible to know how seriously a comment like this is meant. But whether the original writer intended simply to shock or entertain, it is also impossible to know how it might be interpreted.

MGTOW (pronounced “mig-tau” by adherents) are unlikely to meet in person, instead sharing their techniques, successes and failures online, dating a mgtow guy. Throughout the manosphere, it is common to see members expressing paranoia about “normies” who could be out to expose them, often leading to forum users accusing each other of being moles or spies. Nowhere is this fear more prevalent than among MGTOW, with any suggestion of meeting in real life usually receiving a swift and scornful rebuttal.

Once you have “taken the red pill” (ie, opened your eyes to the “reality” that, as a man, the whole world is stacked against you) there are four mainlevels of MGTOW, according to many websites. Level one involves rejecting long-term relationships, while level two extends this to short-term relationships. Level three requires dating a mgtow guy disengagement (reducing taxation as far as possible, in order to avoid paying towards the support of other groups, from “elite alphas” to “single mothers”). As one MGTOW manifesto puts it, as well as fighting to “instil masculinity in men”, MGTOW must “work toward limited government”.

Level four is described as “social rejection”. “The MGTOW drops out of society altogether,” says the MGTOW blogger the Observer Watches. “For all intents and purposes, he does not exist. A urbanite might keep to his own apartment, while someone further out may simply head into the wilderness and go off-grid.”

Those who achieve this ultimate isolation are known as “ghosts” and treated as legends within the community. But most MGTOW seem happy hovering somewhere around level two. Discussions tend to centre on classic manosphere complaints such as the evils of women and misandry (hatred of men). Most of all, they focus on the dangers of interacting with women.

“There is a lot of risk,” David Sherratt, an year-old Cardiff University student and dating a mgtow guy dedicated member of the MGTOW community, noted in “We do not know how many false accusations there are. They could be the majority or they could be the minority.” The implication was that there are so many women ready to lie about rape that any contact with them is simply too dangerous to risk. In reality, a man in the UK is times more likely to be raped himself than falsely accused of rape.

In this, MGTOW resemble men’s rights activists (MRAs) more than incels or PUAs, dating a mgtow guy. Both groups believe that women pose an immediate threat to all men. MRAs believe that women are so unfaithful and untruthful that they often force men to raise other men’s children, thus financially “cuckolding” them. MGTOW believe that women are extremely likely to make false accusations of sexual or domestic violence, in order to damage men socially, steal their money or even have them jailed.

Sherratt also went on to cite a list of concerns that would resonate particularly closely with MRAs, including: “Men are supposed to pay for dates and bow down to women … dating a mgtow guy less than worship is hate” and: “When it comes to marriage, the system is so stacked against men, it does not make sense.” MGTOW and MRAs alike see divorce as deeply one-sided, allowing women to dating a mgtow guy innocent men of money, property and, in some dating a mgtow guy, children.

Unable to stop thinking about Sherratt, I tracked him down to ask about his experience of becoming involved in the community. Now 22, Sherratt is an engineering apprentice and says he has left MGTOW and other manosphere groups behind. At first, he says, they were “legitimately fun … I had lots of friends, which was new to me, lots of fans and positive reinforcement. As we started to grow and build, it honestly felt like we were eventually going to start making some positive change. It wasn’t just a community, but a new, growing movement that I got into ‘before it was cool’, so, in a way, I felt like I was part of something progressive.”

Sherratt dating a mgtow guy not, dating a mgtow guy, however, claim to be a pioneer. It is generally accepted within the MGTOW community that the movement was started in the mids by two men going by the pseudonyms Solaris (an Australian) and Ragnar (a Scandinavian, who describes himself as “an old guy” and a former pilot), both of whom had been previously active in what they described as the “online men’s movement”. “A sense of alienation is where this whole thing starts,” Solaris claimed in a YouTube interview. “You realise, simply because you’re a man, that you are considered a legitimate target for being the butt of jokes or being considered a class enemy.”

As with many areas of the manosphere, it is difficult to know where most users of MGTOW forums and communities are based, though the majority communicate in English, and comments and user names suggest that the US, Canada and the UK are common locations. An alovex.co post entitled Hello From the UK draws enthusiastic replies from “fellow Brits”, who claim to be writing from areas including the Midlands, dating a mgtow guy, Sussex and Salford. They revel in their shared ideology as much as their shared location, heartily agreeing with the participant’s opening salvo: “Fucking women, they are all snakes with tits.”

There is also a website called British MGTOW, which rails against what it describes as the “Nazi-like behaviour” of the British state in silencing and censoring non-PC views, claiming: “The UK is sick and it needs healing. The laws are in desperate need of a revamp but all I see around me are docile willing men led to the slaughter.”

It is, dating a mgtow guy, one imagines, very difficult for a man to release himself completely from the toxic impact of women while entangled within a community feverishly obsessed with, well, women. This was apparent even to the teenage Sherratt, who says: “I understood dating a mgtow guy scepticism of marriage and stuff, but, for men who were talking about trying to live lives that didn’t centre around women, they were talking about them an awful lot.” When he tried to voice his disagreements with various elements of MGTOW ideology, he was accused of being “mind-controlled by a girl”. Soon afterwards, he left the community, having met a girl who (rather unsurprisingly) shared his criticisms. “So I guess the joke’s on them,” he muses.

It is easy to write off MGTOW as a weird group of goofy celibates. Yet it has, in some ways, dating a mgtow guy, quietly penetrated mainstream culture more successfully than any other segment of the manosphere.

In the immediate wake of the #MeToo movement, which saw millions of women worldwide standing up to sexual harassment and assault by sharing their own stories, dating a mgtow guy, there was a swift and severe backlash. Critics claimed that the movement was a pitchfork mob: a “witch-hunt” designed to topple men from their jobs and lives, without so much as an attempt at due process, dating a mgtow guy. Some commentators settled for hounding women who had dared to share their stories, or denigrating the movement as a whole. But gradually another response emerged, borrowing its ideology directly from MGTOW: avoiding women at all costs.

It started with rumours: women reporting that men in their offices had suddenly started declining meetings dating a mgtow guy them or were insisting on leaving the door open. A human resources consultant reported executives telling her that they would no longer get into an elevator alone with a woman. Suddenly, it began to snowball – story after story of men abruptly cancelling business lunches or avoiding women they had previously mentored.

In the same way that the MGTOW movement turns the structural oppression of women on its head, claiming men are the true victims of gender bias, this spate of mainstream examples sought to cast men as the real victims of the #MeToo movement. Men, it argued, had little choice but to protect themselves from the all-powerful cabal of rampaging, vindictive women making false accusations. Even if the solution was as extreme as total isolation.

An orthopaedic surgeon in Chicago told the New York Times that he had ceased ever to be alone with female colleagues, saying: ‘I’m very cautious about it because my livelihood is on the line … If someone in your hospital says you had inappropriate contact with this woman, dating a mgtow guy, you get suspended for an investigation, and your life is over. Does that ever leave you?” His apparent implication that such accusations are simply random, based on no wrongdoing whatsoever, went unchallenged in the piece.

The woman-shunning has even penetrated as far as the White House, where the vice-president, Mike Pence, spawned what is now known as the Dating a mgtow guy Rule after he remarked that he would never eat a meal alone with a woman who is not his wife.

Reporting on such an idea might have once been seen as dating a mgtow guy or biased, requiring careful and robust presentation of opposing arguments. But, as soon as it was attached to Pence, it became respectable fodder for widespread dating a mgtow guy. “THINK,” tweeted Sebastian Gorka, a former deputy assistant to Donald Trump. “If Weinstein had obeyed @VP Pence’s rules for meeting with the opposite sex, dating a mgtow guy, none of those poor women would ever have been abused.” Of course, if Weinstein hadn’t been an abusive predator, the same outcome could have been achieved, too. Just a thought.

Before long, a book had been published to spread the word. As the Amazon listing for The Pence Principle, by Randall Bentwick, puts it: “Every man in America could stand to learn a lesson or two from our vice-president. Be smart … Defend yourself, your career, your family and your life from the false accusations of women dating a german guy and into the future.”

This did not go unnoticed by the MGTOW, whose celebrations were evident in gloating Reddit threads (“Why feminists fear the Mike Pence Rule”) and YouTube videos (“We invented the Pence Rule”). Nor does it remain a niche idea: a study found that 27% of American men now avoid one-on-one meetings with female colleagues. So the ideas we might think of as the shadowy, dating a mgtow guy, ridiculous concerns of the extreme internet fringes are actually being waved under our very noses from the White House front lawn.

This is an edited extract from Men Who Hate Women by Laura Bates, published by Simon & Schuster on 3 September, dating a mgtow guy. To order for £ (RRP £) go to alovex.co P&P charges may apply.

Источник: [alovex.co]

This story is republished from MEL Magazine. MEL aims to challenge, inspire and encourage readers to drop any preconceived notions of who they’re supposed to be.

A few weeks ago, I reached out to the moderator of the primary site devoted to Men Going Their Own Way — a man known as the “Keymaster” — for comment on a recent story about man caves. I assumed a community within the online manosphere dedicated to “preserving i need free dating site man’s sovereignty at all cost” would be fond of any kind of masculine refuge.

I was wrong.

“Bullshit,” the Keymaster told me by phone. “The whole man-cave concept is shunned by MGTOW because the idea is that your wife gives you permission to make one room in the house — the basement — your own. It’s condescending. The man cave makes a mockery out of itself. Like Al Bundy, or one of those unfortunate television-dad morons who apologize to their wives for everything. Those guys need a man cave.”

MGTOW (pronounced “MIG-tau,” at least per everyone I spoke with) is a worldwide social phenomenon and online community of heterosexual dating a mgtow guy who have chosen a lifestyle that avoids legal and romantic entanglements with women dating a mgtow guy all costs. A Man Going His Own Way values self-ownership above all else, believing that he — and only he — has the right to decide what his goals in life should be. He refuses to surrender his will to the social expectations of women and society since he believes both have become hostile toward him.

Image: alovex.co, courtesy MEL Magazine

Some MGTOW make a pledge of celibacy. (“Cut off the dick supply and raise awareness against the millions of chicks that use men and disrespect our natural role.”) Some engage in sex with 100% free dating sites injapan without verification exclusively. (“The only honest women.”) Others sleep with tons of women; they’ll just never marry them. (“Even if a man has only three lovers in his entire life, he is getting more than his own grandfather — who had to marry her first.”)

The media has tended to cover MGTOW by mocking them. For example,VICE’s profile last year, entitled “This Group of Straight Men Is Swearing Off Women,” featured a photo of a fat guy in a homemade MGTOW superhero costume, protesting outside a feminist conference, carrying a placard reading “FEMINISM IS A REFUGE FOR WOMAN’S SEXUAL FAILURE.”

Image: alovex.co, courtesy MEL Magazine

An article on Return of the Kings, a site owned by Roosh Varek, an American blogger known for his controversial writings and advice on the pickup community, deemed MGTOW the “creeping cult of male loserdom”: “Men Going Their Own Way will never appeal to anything more than the rejects of American society because it’s a philosophy that denies the fundamental nature of human beings.” Others simply dismiss it as a cult, dating a mgtow guy. Whatever it is, a Google trends search reveals an expanding movement that can’t simply be cast dating sites for swingers over 50 as a handful of angry misogynists watching porn and playing video games in their parent’s basement.

Most MGTOW will tell you it’s more of a philosophy than a movement, punctuated with a dating an older woman audiobook helping of ZFG (“zero fucks given”), dating a mgtow guy. MGTOW are unapologetically selfish and, unlike men’s rights activists, aren’t looking to change the status quo, but instead trying to opt out of marriage, fatherhood, cohabitation and/or whatever else society expects of them — like a flock of indifferent ostriches.

Smitty the Great One, another MGHOW, employed a slightly more combative analogy in his description to me: “MGTOW are the Viet Cong of the gender war. The men’s rights activists don’t like us because, while we agree with them on some things, dating a mgtow guy, we won’t be their cannon fodder in a war we know they can’t win. Pickup artists hate us because they can’t make money off us. Feminists hate us because we won’t fight them. And women hate us because we won’t give them what they want.”

Motivations for men who decide to go their own way vary, and the discourse is at times unevolved. I found the last three weeks I spent in the MGTOW Manosphere to be, for better or worse, reminiscent of 6th-grade recess — playful, petty and short-tempered. Make no mistake: These guys are alovex.co as they put it, “Turning betas into men is a group effort, no one is in charge … and a good amount of time is spent shooting flaming arrows at each other for no apparent reason.” Immature? You bet. Or as RASman put it:

Them — “You live in a basement, play video games and watch porn all day!”

MGTOW — “I need a battery for my dating a mgtow guy need to man up!”

MGTOW — “Nope.”

Them — “You’re selfish!”

MGTOW — “Yep.”

It’s not dating this guy for four months to draw parallels between MGTOW and the Trump phenomenon: In both cases, men are yearning for a time (in the past or in the future) when they come first, and they blame other groups for their perceived loss of status. Both types are highly suspicious of the media and take pleasure in assailing it. The response to my request for interviews ranged from skeptical disdain to “go fuck yourself.”

“When you come to this site, the first thing you see is a man walking away. Does he look like he wants to do an interview?” Old Sage asked me. “By going our ‘own way’ we’re saying we don’t subscribe to any single set of beliefs or behaviors,” said RASman. “So to get an accurate interview, you’d have to interview 16, of us.”

Image: alovex.co, courtesy MEL Magazine

The Keymaster agreed, explaining that one MGHOW may want to build a cabin in the woods and live off the grid while another may want to move to Thailand with nine girlfriends and twenty kids — but no wife. “Still another may opt for surrogacy and be a dad but not a husband,” he says. “Another may dating a mgtow guy with urban life like anyone else and simply refuse a marriage contract or cohabitation.”

One of the things that makes MGTOW uniquely positioned for massive growth is their policy of “Disorganized Resistance,” a phenomenon where independent groups or people come to the same conclusions and/or actions against others based single artists dating shared philosophies. For instance: The Keymaster may lord over the alovex.co forums, but he has nothing to do with the wildly popular MGTOW subreddit; Spanish-language sites; independent blogs; and a seemingly infinite number of YouTube channels, Facebook pages and Instagram accounts.

This isn’t the only way MGTOW are tough to pin down, according to Sarah Diefendorf, a Ph.D. candidate in sociology and instructor at the University of Washington. She believes MGTOW are actually rebelling against two different things: 1) A society they think privileges women more than men in virtually all institutions; and 2) bad guys like pickup artists and ladies’ men who portray excess, toxic masculinity. “They somewhat brilliantly frame themselves as the overlooked good guys,” she explains. “Women, feminism and pickup artists are all the problems.” This way, Diefendorf says, they’re able to punt on having to unpack the many privileges that come with being a man in the U.S. today. Instead, they can say, “This isn’t me. I’m bowing out.”

Despite their serious loathing of pickup artists, nearly all of MGTOW’s grievances relate in one way or another to what they believe to be a systematic gynocentric bias against men. They specifically point to…

  • Feminist double standards: “Female sexuality should be open and embraced while male sexuality is violent and should be contained.”
  • False rape accusations: “[Rape] ends in just a few minutes with little-to-no harm caused to the victim. Meanwhile, false accusations dating a mgtow guy rape have a long-term and much more devastating impact on the victim.”
  • A corrupt family court system: “Despite all the rhetoric about ‘equal’ rights between the sexes, the gynocentric, misandrous bias of the family court system is illustrated by the raw data.”
  • And finally, this old saw strange dating sites are dangerous drivers: “You wanna make women safer drivers? Take away the car! Or at least take away her cellphone and spray-paint all the mirrors flat black!”

The notion that men are getting a less-than-fair shake is one held by many, including women. Helen Smith, a forensic psychologist, libertarian/conservative blogger and author of Men on Strike, Why Men Are Boycotting Marriage, dating a mgtow guy, Fatherhood, and the American Dream — and Why It Matters, writes in dating a mgtow guy book’s dating a mgtow guy, “I used to consider myself a feminist but mistakenly thought feminism meant equality between the sexes. In today’s culture, it means female privilege, and I believe discrimination against men is every bit as bad as discrimination against women. Dating a mgtow guy men are the ones in need of justice and focus.”

Image: alovex.co, courtesy MEL Magazine

One place Smith — and many, many, many others — points to as evidence is family court. A survey commissioned by the Minnesota Supreme Court found that a majority (56 percent) of the state’s judges, dating a mgtow guy, both male and female, agreed with the statement, “I believe young children belong with their mother.” Sixty-nine percent of male attorneys had come to the conclusion that judges always or often assume from the outset that children belong with their mothers — an assessment 40 percent of female attorneys agreed with. Nearly all the attorneys (94 percent of the men and 84 percent of the women) felt that all judges exhibited prejudice against fathers at least some of the time.

When concerns over unfair favoritism like this are perceived to be falling on deaf ears, according to Smith, “people tune out and start to do their own thing.” Or worse. Many point to the gender bias in family court as a reason why men are eight times more likely to commit suicide than women after a divorce. Thomas Ball exemplifies this statistic. In Junethe year-old New Hampshire man set himself on fire on the courthouse steps because he was “done being bullied for being a man” by the family court.

Lisa Wade, an associate professor of sociology at Occidental College, suggests that this withdrawal can be framed within the context of “male dating a mgtow guy more generally. “When women successfully integrate into a masculine domain, their growing presence makes it unappealing to some men,” she says. “In a way, we can look at relationships as something that women are feeling more and more empowered to shape. MGTOW could be an example of men deciding that this has become too feminized and they’re going to abandon it.”

Another, perhaps more surprising example of male flight? Cheerleading. During the latter half of the s and the early s, cheerleading was seen as a decidedly manly pursuit, “ranking hardly second to that of having been a quarterback.” In fact, cheerleading helped launch the political careers of Dwight D. Eisenhower, Franklin Roosevelt, and Ronald Reagan. The trend to include women in this traditionally masculine activity was largely precipitated by World War II. When men returned from the war, they sought to reclaim their rightful place on cheering squads, but the presence of women had changed how people thought about cheering. In response, male teens turned away from it.

“We’ve seen similar trends in the workplace: As women join a profession, men leave it,” Wade adds, dating a mgtow guy. There was a time, for instance, when all flight attendants were men — until a registered nurse named Ellen Church was hired by United Airlines in Other airlines followed suit, and bywomen had all but taken over the role. Along the same lines, a study of veterinary school applications found that for every 1 percent increase in the proportion of women in the student body, fewer men applied.

Image: alovex.co, courtesy MEL Magazine

Some have noted a certain irony in the fact that MGTOW’s methodology is similar to what feminists have been doing for 50 years. “The ‘migtow’ aversion to interacting with women has a less pleasant parallel to radical feminism,” wrote Matt Forney on Return of Kings. “In the s, extremist feminists such as Andrea Dworkin argued for ‘political lesbianism,’ where feminists only had relationships with other women, regardless of their sexual orientation. Dworkin’s logic was that since men were oppressing women, feminists who dated men were literally fraternizing with the enemy. I wouldn’t dating a mgtow guy surprised if some ‘migtows’ start advocating ‘political homosexuality’ in the future.”

“Feminists have been doing what MGTOW is doing for a long time: saying that marriage is a bad deal and dating a mgtow guy going to pass on it,” Wade browse dating site. “So what MGTOW is doing is very much in the hallowed feminist dating a mgtow guy of deciding that this deal isn’t one they want to take.”

The Keymaster, not surprisingly, disagrees.

“You need to study (or at least be aware of) the history of MGTOW before implying such a thing. What MGTOW is doing is what MGTOW have always done. Long before the first ‘feminist’ even existed.”

Given that it seems likely we’re about to have our first female president, I ask Keymaster about the upcoming election. I assume MGTOW’s not endorsing Hillary? “There’s just no way,” he answers. “For so many reasons. She’s not a person of integrity, for starters. MGTOW really holds integrity as a virtue. That’s not to say MGTOW will endorse Trump, either. See, voting is just giving your consent to be governed. So, by casting your vote, you’re saying I want you to rule me. Doesn’t matter who you vote for. MGTOW is dating a mgtow guy the concept of voting for any government!”

His response surprised me: I wasn’t anticipating an anarchic battle cry.

Wade, however, sees it as more of a departure from tradition. “It suggests that MGTOW is advocating for more than just dating a mgtow guy retreat from relationships with women; they’re advocating for a particular kind of masculinity that’s totally different from any other masculinities that have been influential in American history. The most obvious counterexample would be the caretaking masculinity: I’m going to be a breadwinner and take care of my family. Or: I’m going to be a patriotic leader for my country. They reject and withdraw from even the most familiar archetypes of American masculinity.”

Источник: [alovex.co]

Why women lose the dating game

This was published 9 years ago

Bettina Arndt listens to the other voices in this debate: the men.

Naomi sat in the back row of Melbourne's Grattan Institute, about to watch her fiance give a lecture. She was joined by three unfamiliar women - all attractive, well groomed, in their mids. From their whispered chat, dating a mgtow guy, she quickly realised they weren't there to hear about politics and dating a mgtow guy but to meet her eligible man. Naomi explains: ''He's 36 years old and is definitely someone who falls into the alpha-male category: excellent job in finance, PhD, high income, six feet two, sporty and very handsome. And he's an utter sweetheart.''

Naomi is an attractive year-old PhD student. She has been in a relationship with her fiance for six years. Her new companions were very friendly and chatted to her during the break. But then her partner, who had been socialising at the front of the room, dating a mgtow guy, made eye contact with Naomi and smiled.

''The women saw this and it was like the room had suddenly frozen over. There was silence and then one of them asked me if I knew him. I wasn't going to lie, so I told them he was my partner and how long we'd been together. It was amazing how they responded. They stopped smiling at me, dating a mgtow guy, shifted awkwardly in their seats and looked me up and down as if they were trying to figure out how a girl who still wears jeans and ballet flats could land a guy like that.'' The women left before her man gave his speech.

Naomi is stunned by the number of women in their 30s who throw themselves at her partner: the colleagues who sign emails with kisses; the female journalist who pointedly asked, post-interview, if he was married. Yet given the plight of thirtysomething women seeking partners, it's hardly surprising that her boyfriend is in their sights.

We hear endless complaints from women about the lack of good men.

Women astonished that men don't seem to be around when they decide it is time to settle down. Women telling men to ''man up'' and stop shying away from commitment.

But there is another conversation going on - a fascinating exchange about what is happening from the male point of view. Much of it thrives on the internet, in the so-called ''manosphere''. Here you will find men cheerfully, even triumphantly, blogging about their experience. They have cause for celebration, you see. They've discovered a profound change has taken place in the mating game and, to their surprise, they are the winners.

Dalrock (alovex.co) is typical: ''Today's unmarried twentysomething women have given men an ultimatum: I'll marry when I'm ready, take it or leave it. This is, of course, their right. But ultimatums are a risky thing, because there is always a possibility the other side will decide to leave it. In the next decade we will witness the end result of dating a mgtow guy game of marriage chicken.''

The endgame Dalrock warns about is already in play for hordes of unmarried professional women - the well-coiffed lawyers, bankers dating a mgtow guy other success stories. Many thought they could put off marriage and families until their 30s, having devoted their 20s to education, establishing careers and playing the field. But was their decade of dating a strategic mistake?

Jamie, a year-old Sydney barrister, thinks so: ''Women labour under the impression they can have it all. They can have the career, dating a mgtow guy, this carefree lifestyle and then, at the snap of their fingers, because they are so fabulous, find a man. But if they wait until their 30s they're competing with women who are much younger and in various ways more attractive.''

The crisis for single women in this age group seeking a mate is very real. Almost one in three women aged 30 to 34 and a quarter of lates women do not have a partner, according to the census statistics. And this is a growing problem. The number of partnerless women in their 30s has almost doubled since

The challenge is greatest for high-achieving women in their 30s dating a mgtow guy for equally successful men. Analysis of census figures by the Monash University sociologist, Genevieve Heard, reveals that almost one in four of degree-educated women in their 30s will miss out on a man of similar age and educational achievement. There were only 68, unattached graduate men in their 30s for 88, single graduate women in the same age group.

The 30s are worrying years for high-achieving women who long for marriage and children - of course, not all do - as they face their rapidly closing reproductive window surrounded by men who see no rush to settle down

And the higher-education gap keeps widening. In the past year, the proportion of degree-educated women aged 25 to 34 rose from per cent to per cent, according to the Bureau of Statistics, while for males the figure remained below 30 per cent, having risen only per cent in the past year.

Although there are similar numbers of single men and women in their 30s overall - aboutof each across Australia - half these available men had only high school education, 57 per cent earned $42, or less and 95, of them were unemployed.

The high expectations of professional women are a big part of the story. Many high-achieving women simply are not interested in Mr Average, says Justin Parfitt, the owner of Australia's fastest growing speed-dating organisation, Fast Impressions. Parfitt adds: ''They've swallowed the L'Oreal line: 'Because you're worth it!' There's a real sense of entitlement.''

He finds many of his female members are determined to meet only men who are tall, attractive, wealthy and well educated. They want the alpha males. ''Most of the professional women rarely dating a mgtow guy out 'yes' votes to men who aren't similarly successful,'' reports Parfitt, who struggles to attract enough of these successful men to his speed-dating events. Sixty per cent of his members are female. Most are over

During their 20s, women compete for the most highly desirable men, the Mr Bigs. Many will readily share a bed with the sporty, attractive, confident men, while ordinary men miss out. As Whiskey puts it at alovex.co: ''Joe Average Beta Male is about as desirable to women as a cold bowl of oatmeal.''

Data from American colleges show 20 per cent of males - the most attractive ones - get 80 per cent of the sex, according to an analysis by Susan Walsh, a former management consultant who wrote about the issue on her dating website, dating a mgtow guy, alovex.co

That leaves a lot of beta men spending their 20s out in the cold. Greg, a year-old writer from Melbourne, started adult life shy and lonely. ''In my 20s, the women had the total upper hand. They could make or break you with one look in a club or bar. They had the choice of men, sex was on tap and guys like me went home alone, red-faced, defeated and embarrassed. The girls only wanted to go for the cool guys, good looks, outgoing personalities, money, sporty types, the kind of guys who owned the room, while us quiet ones got ignored.''

He barely had a date through much of his 20s and gave up on women. But then he spent time overseas, gained more confidence, learnt how to dress well and hit his early 30s. ''I suddenly started to black motorcycle dating asked out by women, aged 19 through to The floodgates burst open for me, dating a mgtow guy. I actually dated five women at once, amazing my flatmates by often bedding three to four of my casual dates each week. It is a great time as a male in your 30s, when you start getting more female attention and sex than you could ever have dreamt of in your 20s.''

That's when some men start behaving very badly - as the manosphere clearly shows. These internet sites are not for the faint-hearted. The voices are often crude and misogynist. But they tell it as they see it. There is Greenlander, an apparently successful engineer in his late 30s. In his early adult life, he was unable to ''get the selfies for dating apps guys of day from women''. Now he's interested only in women under

''The women I know in their early 30s are just delusional,'' he says. ''I sometimes seduce them and sleep with them just because I know how to play them so well. It's just too easy. They're tired of the cock carousel and they see a guy like me as the perfect beta to settle down with before their eggs dry out … when I get tired of them I just delete their numbers from my cell phone and stop taking their calls … It dating a mgtow guy really hurt them that much: at this point they're used to pump & dump!''

It's easy to dismiss such bile but Greenlander's analysis is echoed by many Australian singles, both male and female.

''It's wall-to-wall arseholes out there,'' reports Penny, a year-old lawyer. She is stunned by how hard it is to meet suitable men willing to commit. ''I'm horrified by the number of gorgeous, independent and successful women my age who can't meet a decent man.''

Penny acknowledges part of the problem is her own expectations - that her generation of women was brought up wanting too much, dating a mgtow guy. ''We were told we were special, we could do anything and the world was our oyster.'' And having spent her 20s dating alpha males, she expected them to be still around when she finally decided to get serious.

But these men go fast, many fishing outside their pond. The most attractive, successful men can take their pick from women their own age or from the Naomis, the younger women who are happy to settle early. Almost one in three degree-educated year-old men marries or lives with women aged 30 or under, according to income, housing and marriage surveys by the Bureau of Statistics.

''I can't believe how many men my age are only interested in younger women,'' wails Gail, a year-old advertising executive as she describes her first search through men's profiles on the RSVP internet dating a mgtow guy site. She is shocked to find many mids men have set up dating a mgtow guy profiles to refuse mail from women their own age.

Talking to many women like her, it's intriguing how many look back on past relationships where they let good men get away because they weren't ready. American journalist Kate Bolick wrote recently in The Atlantic about breaking off her three-year relationship with a man she described as ''intelligent, good-looking, loyal and kind''. She acknowledged ''there was no good reason to end things'', yet, at the time, she was convinced something was missing in the relationship. That was 11 years ago. She's is now 39 and facing grim choices.

''We arrived at the top of the staircase,'' Bolick wrote, ''finally ready to start our lives, only to discover a cavernous room at the tail end of a party, most of the men gone already, some having never shown up - and those who remain are leering by the cheese table, or are, you know, dating a mgtow guy, the ones you don't want to go out with.''

So, many women are missing out on their fairytale ending - their assumption that when the time was right the dream man would be waiting. The 30s are worrying years for high-achieving women who long for marriage and children - of course, not all do - as they face their rapidly closing reproductive window surrounded by men who see no rush to settle down.

And, of course, many women eventually do find a mate, often ending up with divorced men. There are complications with that second-marriage market, in which men come complete with former wives and children. That was never part of the plan.

Many really struggle with the fact that they aren't in a position to be too choosy. American author Lori Gottlieb gives a painfully honest account of that process in her book Marry Him: The Case for Settling for Mr Good Enough.

''Maybe we need to get over ourselves,'' she writes. The year-old single mother enlisted a team of advisers who helped her realise that while she was conducting her long search for the perfect man - Prince Dating apps that want sex or nobody - her market value had dropped through the floor.

''Our generation of women is constantly told to have high self-esteem, but it seems that the women themselves are at risk of ego-tripping themselves out of romantic connection,'' she writes. She acknowledges she made a mistake not looking for a spouse in her 20s, when she was at her most desirable. She advises thirtysomething women to look for Mr Good Enough before they have even less choice. ''They are with an '8' but they want a '10'. But then suddenly they're 40 and can only get a '5'!''

Women delaying their search for a serious relationship have set up a very different dating and marriage market. The Sydney barrister, Jamie, finds himself spoilt for choice, dating a mgtow guy. Like many of his friends he's finding women actively pursuing him, asking him out, cooking him elaborate meals, buying him presents. ''Oh, you're a barrister,'' they say.

Loading

While many of his mates are playing the field, determined to enjoy this unexpected attention, Jamie is ready to settle down, dating a mgtow guy. He's very wary of Sex and the City types, women who are convinced they are so special, but he's confident dating a mgtow guy will soon find someone with her feet on the ground.

''I'm lucky,'' he says, ''to be in a buyer's market.''

From our partners

Источник: [alovex.co]

Pew Research Center conducted this study to understand Americans’ attitudes toward and personal experiences with dating and relationships. These findings are based on a survey conducted Oct., among 4, U.S. adults. This includes those who took part as members of Pew Research Center’s American Trends Panel (ATP), an online survey panel that is recruited through national, random sampling of residential addresses, as well as respondents from the Ipsos KnowledgePanel who indicated that they identify as lesbian, gay or bisexual (LGB).

Recruiting ATP panelists by phone or mail ensures that nearly all U.S. adults have a chance of selection. This gives us confidence that any dating a mgtow guy can represent the whole U.S. adult population (see our Methods explainer on random sampling). To further ensure that each ATP survey reflects a balanced cross-section of the nation, the data are weighted to match the U.S. adult population by gender, race, ethnicity, dating a mgtow guy, partisan affiliation, education and other categories.

For more, see the report’s methodology about the project. You can also find the questions asked, and the answers the public provided, in this topline.

Partnered adults are those who say they are currently married, living with a partner or in a committed romantic relationship.

Single or unpartnered adults are those who say they are currently not married, living with a partner or in a committed romantic relationship. A small share of single adults report that they are casually dating someone.

Daters, single-and-looking and on the dating market all indicate that someone is currently not married, living with a partner or in a committed romantic relationship and has indicated that they are looking for a committed romantic relationship only, casual dates only or either a committed romantic relationship or casual dates.

Not dating, dating a mgtow guy, not looking, dating a mgtow guy, non-daters or not on the dating market means someone is not married, living with a partner or in a committed romantic relationship and has indicated that they are not currently looking for a relationship or dates.

Relationship, committed relationship and committed romantic relationship are used interchangeably.

Casually dating someone refers to single adults who say they are currently casually dating someone – regardless of whether they say they are looking for a committed romantic relationship, casual dates or neither.

LGB is sometimes used as a shorthand for adults who identify as lesbian, gay or bisexual, regardless of the sex of their partner, if they are partnered.

Online dating users or online daters refer to the 30% of respondents in this survey who answered yes to the following question: “Have you ever used an online dating site or dating app?”

References to White and Black adults include only those who are non-Hispanic and identify as only one race. Hispanics are of any race. The views and experiences of Asian Americans are not analyzed separately in this report due to sample limitations. Data for Asian Americans and other racial and ethnic groups are incorporated into the general population figures throughout the report.

References to college graduates or people with a college degree comprise those with a bachelor’s degree or more education. Some college includes those with an associate degree and those who attended college but did not obtain a degree. High school refers to those who have a high school diploma or its equivalent, such as a General Education Development (GED) certificate.

All references to party affiliation include those who lean toward that party. Republicans include those who identify as Republicans and independents who say they lean toward the Republican Party, and Democrats include those who identify as Democrats and independents who say they lean toward the Democratic Party.

References to those living in gay dating sites in dallas, suburban and rural areas are based on respondents’ answer to the following question: “How would you describe the community where you currently live? (1) urban, (2) suburban, (3) rural.”

Most daters say their dating lives aren’t going well and it’s difficult to find people to datedating a mgtow guy height="">As more Americans turn to online dating and the #MeToo movement leaves its imprint on the dating scene, nearly half of U.S. adults – and a majority of women – say that dating has become harder in the last 10 years.

Among those who are on the dating market – the 15% of American adults who are single and looking for a committed relationship or casual dates – most say they are dissatisfied with their dating lives and that it has been difficult to find people to date, according to a Pew Research Center survey conducted in October

Other publications from this survey

While single-and-looking men and women report equal levels of dissatisfaction with their dating lives and the ease of finding people to date, women are more likely to say they have had some particularly negative experiences. Most women who are currently single and looking to date dating a mgtow guy say they have experienced at least one of six harassing behaviors asked about in the survey from someone they were dating or had been on a date with, such as being touched in a way that made them uncomfortable or rumors being spread about their sexual history. This compares with 50% of men who are single and looking. The pattern holds when looking at all women and men, dating a mgtow guy, whether they are currently on the dating market or not.

Women are also more likely to see risk – both physical and emotional – when it comes to dating. When those who say dating has become harder for most people in the last 10 years are asked to describe in their own words why they think this is the case, women are twice as likely as men to cite increased risk. For their part, men are more likely than women to say technology is a reason dating has gotten harder. Overall, 47% of Americans say dating is now harder than it was 10 years ago, while 19% say it’s easier and 33% say it’s about the same.

Long-distance relationships, debt and voting for Donald Trump top list of relationship deal breakersSingles who are looking for a relationship are generally open to dating people with many different traits and from a variety of backgrounds. For example, large majorities say they would consider dating a mgtow guy relationship with someone of a different religion or different race or ethnicity than them. Most also say they would seriously dating a mgtow guy someone who makes significantly more or significantly dating a mgtow guy money than them. When it comes to being in a relationship with someone who lives far away, has a significant amount of debt, or who dating a mgtow guy for Donald Trump, however, many of those who are looking for a relationship would hesitate.

The nationally representative survey of 4, dating a mgtow guy, U.S. adults was conducted online Oct.– before the coronavirus pandemic shook the dating landscape – using Pew Research Center’s American Trends Panel.

Among the other key findings:

Most Americans say it’s harder for men to know how to behave on dates in the era of the #MeToo movement

The public sees challenges for men dating in the era of #MeToo A majority of the overall public (65%) says the increased focus on sexual harassment and assault in the last few years has made it harder for men to know how to interact with someone they’re on a date with. About a quarter (24%) say it hasn’t made much difference, and 9% say it has become easier for men to know how to behave. Fewer people think this focus on harassment and assault has made it harder for women to know how to interact with someone they’re on a date with (43%), dating a mgtow guy, while 38% say it hasn’t made much difference for women.

Men – especially older men – and Republicans are more likely than women and Democrats to say it’s harder for men to know how to act when dating in the era of the #MeToo movement, though majorities across the board express this view. For example, 75% of men ages 50 and older say it is now harder for men to know how to behave on dates, compared with 63% of men younger than 50, 58% of women younger than 50 and 63% of women 50 and older.

Premarital sex is largely seen as acceptable, but most view sex on a first date and open relationships as taboo

Most Americans say premarital sex is at least sometimes acceptable Most adults (65%) say sex between unmarried adults in a committed relationship is acceptable at least sometimes, including 43% who say this is always acceptable. Casual sex between consenting adults who are not in a committed dating a mgtow guy is also seen as generally acceptable (62%). About half (49%) say it is acceptable for consenting adults to exchange explicit images of themselves.

When it comes to open relationships – that is, a committed relationship where both people agree that it is acceptable to date or have sex with other people – the public is less accepting. Some 32% think this can be acceptable at least sometimes (regardless of whether they would do it themselves), while 48% say open relationships are never acceptable. Having sex on a first date is also still seen as taboo by some. While 30% say it can be acceptable under some or all circumstances, 42% say it is never acceptable.

Younger adults are more likely to see these dating norms as acceptable – sometimes dramatically so. For example, 70% of to year-olds say consenting adults exchanging explicit images of themselves can be acceptable at least sometimes, compared with just 21% of those ages 65 and older. Lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) adults also tend to be more accepting of these norms than their straight counterparts. In fact, LGB adults are the only demographic group studied in which a majority said that open relationships are always or sometimes acceptable (61% vs. 29% of straight adults).

Vast majorities say that breaking up through technology is mostly unacceptable, and few say they would ‘ghost’ someone

Breaking up in person is largely seen as the only acceptable way to end a committed relationshipDespite concerns that Americans’ rising dependence dating a mgtow guy communicating through technology would lead to more impersonal breakups through devices, most agree that breaking up in person is the way to go. Dating a mgtow guy vast majority of adults say that it is always or sometimes acceptable for a person to break up with a committed romantic partner in person (97%). About half (51%) say it is at least sometimes acceptable to break up over the phone – though only 10% say this is always acceptable. Far fewer say it can be acceptable to break up through a text message (14%), email (14%) or private message on a social media site (11%). In fact, most say it is never acceptable to end committed dating a mgtow guy through those forms of technology. The shares are strikingly similar when it comes to breaking up with someone a person is casually dating rather than in a committed relationship with.

The survey also asked those who are single and looking for a relationship or dates how they would let someone know they didn’t want to go out with them again after a first date. Only 8% say they would ghost someone (cut off communication). About half (52%) say they wouldn’t take the initiative to reach out but would let the other person know if they got in touch. The remaining share (40%) say they would contact the other person to let them know. Single-and-looking men are evenly dating a mgtow guy on whether they would proactively let the other person know if they didn’t want to go out again after the first date (47%) or wait for the other person to contact them before letting them know (47%). A majority of single-and-looking women (59%), on the other hand, would respond if the other person got in touch first, while 30% say they dating a mgtow guy proactively reach out and let the other person know.

Single people overall report that they don’t feel much pressure from society and the people they know to find a partner

Most single people don’t feel a lot of pressure to find a partnerMost single people (including both those on and off the dating market) say they don’t feel a lot of pressure to find a partner from their friends, family or society in general. About dating a mgtow guy (22%) say they feel at least some pressure from friends, while 31% say the same about family members and 37% say they feel society is pressuring them.

Feeling pressure to be in a committed relationship is highly dependent on age. Younger singles feel much more pressure from each source. For example, 53% of single to year-olds say there is at least some pressure from society to find a partner, compared with 42% of to year-olds, 32% of to year-olds and 21% of those ages 65 and older. In fact, a majority of singles 65 and older – the vast majority of whom are widowed or divorced, in contrast to young singles who are mostly never married – say they feel no pressure at all from each of these sources.

Single women and men give different reasons for difficulty finding people to date

Women say it’s hard to find someone who is looking for the same kind of relationship and meets their standardsDaters who had difficulty finding people to date in the past year were asked about some of the possible reasons that might be the case. Among these daters, the most common explanations include the challenge of finding someone who is looking for the same type of relationship (53% say this is a major reason), difficulty in approaching people (46%) and trouble finding someone who meets their expectations (43%).

There are large differences by gender on this topic. Single-and-looking women are far more likely than single-and-looking men to say that trouble finding someone who was looking for the same kind of relationship or who meets their expectations are major reasons they’ve had difficulty. In turn, dating a mgtow guy, men are much more likely than women to say difficulty approaching people is a major reason.

Roughly one-in-ten partnered adults met their partners online, but this is far more common among some groups

Partnered LGB adults are far more likely than their straight counterparts to have met their partner online A plurality of those who are married, living with a partner or in a committed romantic relationship say they first met their spouse or partner through friends or family (32%). Smaller shares say they met through work (18%) or school (17%), and still fewer met their partner online (12%).

While relatively small shares of partnered adults first met their partner online, some groups are more likely to have done so. About one-in-five partnered adults ages 18 to 29 (21%) say they met their partner online, compared with 15% or fewer among their older counterparts. And LGB adults are far more likely to have first met their partner online than straight adults (28% vs. 11%).

Overall, three-in-ten adults say they have used an online dating site or app, and a majority (57%) of those users say their experiences with online dating were positive. Most also say it was easy to find dating a mgtow guy they were physically attracted to and who shared their hobbies and interests.

Online dating isn’t the only way Americans dating a mgtow guy using the internet to help them navigate the dating scene. About four-in-ten adults (38%) say they have searched for information online about someone they were romantically interested in. This is especially common among young adults: 64% of those younger than age 30 say they have done this.

Half of single adults – and a majority of single women – are not on the dating market

Half of singles are not looking for relationship or datesFully half of single adults say they are not currently looking for a relationship or dates. Among those who are on the dating market, about half are open to either a committed relationship or casual dates.

Single men are far more likely than single women to be looking for a relationship or dates – 61% vs, dating a mgtow guy. 38%. This gender gap is especially apparent among older singles.

Among singles who are not looking to date, having more important priorities right now and just enjoying the single life are among the most common reasons cited. Non-daters younger than age 50 are particularly likely to say they have more important priorities at the moment.

Defining who is partnered, who is single and who is a ‘dater’

 

Источник: [alovex.co]

Men Going Their Own Way

Anti-feminist, misogynistic, mostly online male-separatist community

MGTOW logo as shown in episode "Men at War" of the BBC series Reggie Yates' Extreme UK

Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW) is an anti-feminist, misogynistic, dating a mgtow guy, mostly-online community advocating for men to dating a mgtow guy themselves from women and from a society which they believe has been corrupted by feminism.[2] The community is a part of the manosphere, a collection of anti-feminist websites and online communities that also includes the men's rights movement, incels, and insecure dating good looking guys artists.[3]

Like other manosphere communities, MGTOW overlaps with the alt-right and white supremacist movements,[4] and it has been implicated in online harassment of women.[5] The Southern Dating a mgtow guy Law Center categorizes MGTOW as a part of the male supremacist ideology.[6]

History

While it is not clear where the MGTOW ideology originated, it is believed to have emerged in the early s. A blog called No Ma'am was one of the first sites dedicated to the ideology, publishing a "MGTOW Manifesto" in Earlier members of MGTOW were largely libertarian. There is a divide between early and contemporary members of MGTOW, with some earlier members expressing derision for the present-day MGTOW community. There have been several prominent online MGTOW sites, including the subreddit r/MGTOW, created insmaller auxiliary subreddits, and the MGTOW Forum, an independent website that emerged in Following Reddit's ban of a large incel subreddit, r/MGTOW was briefly the largest and most active manosphere forum on the site.

MGTOW communities and their fellow manosphere group, pick-up artists, began to merge with the alt-right when it came to prominence beginning in The two groups overlap both in membership and in ideology; both believe that feminism has destroyed Western society. MGTOW and other manosphere mature online dating also overlap with various white supremacist, authoritarian, and populist movements alovex.co-right commentator and polemicistMilo Yiannopoulos is credited with helping to popularize MGTOW with a Breitbart article about "the Sexodus", dating a mgtow guy, in which he described men who were eschewing women, love, dating a mgtow guy, sex, and marriage because of feminism.

Researchers have implicated MGTOW communities in online harassment of women. In January a group of computer scientists published a preprint of a paper titled "The Evolution of the Manosphere Across the Web"; r/MGTOW and the MGTOW Forum were among the online communities which the authors said "have been growing in size and in their involvement in online harassment and real-world violence." The paper was described in dating a mgtow guy Technology Review as "the most complete picture yet of the misogynistic groups that fuel the incel movement online" and in Der Spiegel as "the most comprehensive attempt yet to analyze the manosphere online". Shortly after publication, Reddit quarantined r/MGTOW, dating a mgtow guy, a restriction the platform applies to subreddits determined to be "extremely offensive or upsetting to the average redditor" which prevents them from earning advertising revenue and requires visitors to agree to seeing potentially offensive content before entering. r/MGTOW was banned in August for breaking the site's policies against promotion of violence and hate.

Membership

Members of MGTOW communities are primarily heterosexual, white, middle-class men from North America and Europe. Unlike some other manosphere groups, MGTOW is exclusively male. MGTOW often disavow hierarchies and claim to be leaderless; some deny that MGTOW is a group or movement at all, instead emphasizing each member's individuality and independence within a collective.[18] Jones and colleagues writing in New Media & Society in describe the size of MGTOW communities: "while the precise number of MGTOW followers is unclear, it appears to be a popular and growing group within the Manosphere: the subreddit r/MGTOW has grown from 54, members in early tomembers in early and there are 32, members listed on one MGTOW forum." Author Donna Zuckerberg described MGTOW in her book Not All Dead White Men as smaller than the men's dating app for fitness rights movement and the seduction (pickup artistry) communities, with the MGTOW Forum having over 25, subscribers and r/MGTOW having over 35,

Ideology

At the center of MGTOW ideology is the notion of male separatism and the belief that society has been corrupted by feminism. MGTOW groups are misogynist and anti-feminist, dating a mgtow guy, believing that feminism has made women dangerous to men, and dating a mgtow guy male self-preservation requires dissociating completely from women.[21] They believe there is systemic gynocentric bias against men, including double standards in gender roles and bias against men in family courts. MGTOW groups share a belief common among other manosphere groups that women follow a similar pattern in dating and marriage: young and attractive women are promiscuous and engage in "hypergamy", having sex with numerous men and abandoning a man if a "higher-value" man shows interest. They believe women gravitate towards "alpha men" who are attractive but mistreat them, and that this solidifies their beliefs in feminism. As the women begin to age, the MGTOW ideology explains that they choose to settle down with "beta males" who provide for them financially, but to whom they deny sex, sometimes choosing to have sex with attractive men outside of their marriage. Finally, the ideology holds that the women will divorce dating a mgtow guy husbands, and that courts will favor the women in divorce proceedings due to what they describe as female privilege.[22]

A paper in Information, Communication & Society stated that "MGTOW propagate extensive and wide-ranging passive or undirected harassment and misogyny on Twitter." Fellows at the Institute for Research on Male Supremacism publishing with the International Centre for Counter-Terrorism have said that members of MGTOW "openly disdain women, and normalize it through online harassment." The Southern Poverty Law Center categorizes MGTOW as a part of the male supremacist ideology,[6] a category they began tracking on their hate group tracking project, Hate Map, in

Men in the MGTOW community use jargon shared by the broader manosphere, including the red pill and blue pill metaphor borrowed from top 10 hookup dating sites film The Matrix. Those in the manosphere who have been awakened from feminist "delusion" to the supposed reality that society is dating a mgtow guy misandrist and dominated by feminist values are said to be "redpilled" or have "taken the red pill"; those who do not accept that ideology are referred to as "bluepilled".[26] Other jargon includes pejorative terms for other men such as "beta", "cuck", "soy boy", and "white knight".

Members of MGTOW communities track their engagement with the ideology on a series of four levels. At the first level, men believe they are used and manipulated by women (called "situational awareness" or the "red pill") but still believe in the value of marriage; they are sometimes described as "purple pilled".[30] At the second level, men reject long-term relationships, cohabitation, and marriage, but will still participate in shorter term relationships and sexual encounters.[31] At the third level, men reject short-term relationships and limit their interactions with women.[32] At the fourth level, dating a mgtow guy, men minimize their engagement with the state and society, including employment; this is called "going ghost".[note 1]

Relation to dating a mgtow guy manosphere groups

Main article: Manosphere

The MGTOW community is a part of the manosphere, a heterogeneous group of websites, blogs, and online forums promoting some forms of masculinity, hostility towards women, dating a mgtow guy, strong opposition to feminism, and exaggerated misogyny.[33] In addition to MGTOW, the men's rights movement, incels, pick-up artists, and father's rights movements also make up the manosphere.[34]

Men's rights movement

See also: Men's rights movement

Although some consider MGTOW to be a part of the men's rights movement, others have cited MGTOW's separatist ideology as distinguishing them from the men's rights movement, which engages in activism to try to drive societal change. According to Donna Zuckerberg, early MGTOW groups were primarily libertarian and opposed to "big government"; this led to a rift with the men's rights movements who wished to lobby for governmental change, particularly with regards to custody and divorce law.

Pickup artistry

See also: Pickup artist

The MGTOW community has a reciprocal disdain for pickup artists (PUAs) due to their differing opinions towards women. Whereas MGTOW focuses on separating entirely from women, pickup artists focus on developing techniques to have sex with women. PUA communities have mocked MGTOW as dating a mgtow guy Going Their Own Way". MGTOW communities deride PUAs as being entirely dependent on women's approval, and because they place so much value in attaining sexual success with women, MGTOW says PUA communities contribute to what they see as overvaluing of women in gynocentric society.

Notes

  1. ^The MGTOW Wiki divides social and economic disengagement into separate levels.

References

  1. ^Wright, Trott & Jones (), pp.&#;3–4; Nagle (), p.&#;94; Zuckerberg (), p.&#;19; Lin (), p.&#;78
  2. ^Hodapp (), p.&#;xviii; Jones, dating a mgtow guy, Trott & Wright (), p.&#;2; Ging (), p.&#;; Zuckerberg (), p.&#;18; Nagle (), p.&#;93
  3. ^Zuckerberg (), p.&#;19; Ging & Siapera (), p.&#;x
  4. ^Wright, Trott & Jones (), p.&#;2; Nagle (), pp.&#;18, 94; Ribeiro et al. (), p.&#;1
  5. ^ ab"Male Supremacy". Southern Poverty Law Center, dating a mgtow guy. Archived from the original on June 7,
  6. ^Wright, Trott & Jones (), p.&#;4; Lin (), pp.&#;91–92
  7. ^Wright, Trott & Jones (), pp.&#;3–4; Nagle (), p.&#;94; Zuckerberg (), p.&#;19; Lin (), p.&#;77; Hodapp (), pp.&#;xvii–xviii
  8. ^Lin (), pp.&#;88–89; Nagle (), dating a mgtow guy, pp.&#;95–97; Ging (), dating a mgtow guy, pp.&#;–; Van Valkenburgh (), p.&#;9; Zuckerberg (), p.&#;19
  9. ^Winter (), pp.&#;51–54; Lumsden (), p.&#;99; Ging (), p.&#;; Zuckerberg (), pp.&#;1–2, 12–13; Nagle (), pp.&#;93–94
  10. ^Lin (), dating a mgtow guy, p.&#;90; Nagle (), p.&#;94
  11. ^Hodapp (), p.&#;xviii; Lin (), p.&#;90; Dating a mgtow guy (), dating a mgtow guy (), p.&#;xviii; Lin (), dating a mgtow guy, p.&#;90
  12. ^Hodapp (), p.&#;xv; Lumsden (), dating a mgtow guy Marwick & Lewis (), p.&#;13
  13. ^Jones, Trott & Wright (), p.&#;2; Nagle (), pp.&#;86–87; Zuckerberg (), p.&#;17

Works cited

  • Basu, Tanya (February 7, ). "The 'manosphere' is getting more toxic as angry men join the incels". MIT Technology Review.
  • Baumgärtner, Maik; Höfner, Roman; Müller, Ann-Katrin; Rosenbach, Marcel; Spiegel, Der (March 10, ). "Hatred Against Women: The Dark World of Extremist Misogyny". Der Spiegel. Retrieved March 25, : CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  • "Men at War", dating a mgtow guy. Reggie Yates' Extreme UK. Season 1. Episode 2. January 12, 22 minutes in. BBC. BBC Three.
  • Ging, Debbie (). "Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere". Men and Masculinities. 22 (4): – doi/X ISSN&#;X. S2CID&#;
  • Ging, Debbie; Siapera, Eugenia, eds. (). Gender Hate Online: Understanding the New Anti-Feminism. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. doi/ ISBN&#. OCLC&#;
  • Hodapp, Christa (). Men's Rights, Gender, and Social Media. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books. ISBN&#.
  • Janik, Rachel (April 24, ). ""I laugh at the death of normies": How incels are celebrating the Toronto mass killing". Hatewatch. Southern Poverty Law Center.
  • Jasser, Greta; Kelly, Megan; Rothermel, Ann-Kathrin (May 20, ). "Male supremacism and the Hanau terrorist attack: between online misogyny and far-right violence". International Centre for Counter-Terrorism Journal. International Centre for Counter-Terrorism.
  • Jones, Callum; Trott, Verity; Wright, Scott (). "Sluts and soyboys: MGTOW and the production of misogynistic online harassment". New Media & Society. 22 (10): – doi/ ISSN&#; S2CID&#;
  • Lin, Jie Liang (). "Antifeminism Online: MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way)". In Frömming, Urte Undine; Köhn, Steffen; Fox, dating a mgtow guy, Samantha; Terry, Mike (eds.). Digital Environments: Ethnographic Perspectives Across Global Online and Offline Spaces. Edition Medienwissenschaft. Transcript Verlag. pp.&#;77– ISBN&#. JSTOR&#;alovex.co1xxrxw
  • Lumsden, Karen (). "'I Want to Kill You in Front of Your Children' Is Not a Threat. It's an Expression of a Desire': Discourses of Online Abuse, Trolling, and Violence on r/MensRights". In Lumsden, Karen; Harmer, Emily (eds.). Online Othering: Exploring Digital Violence and Discrimination on the Web. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. pp.&#;91– ISBN&#.
  • Marwick, Alice; Lewis, dating a mgtow guy, Rebecca (May 15, ), dating a mgtow guy. Media Manipulation and Disinformation Online (Report). New York: Data & Society Research Institute. Retrieved June 13,
  • Nagle, dating a mgtow guy, Angela (). Kill All Normies: Online Culture Wars From 4Chan And Tumblr To Trump And The Alt-Right. Alresford, UK: Zero Books. ISBN&#.
  • Ribeiro, Manoel Horta; Blackburn, Jeremy; Bradlyn, dating a mgtow guy, Barry; et&#;al, dating a mgtow guy. (January 21, ), dating a mgtow guy. "The Evolution of the Manosphere Across the Web". arXivv2 [alovex.co].
  • Schmitz, Rachel M.; Kazyak, Emily (). Robinson, Christine M.; Spivey, Sue (eds.). "Masculinities in Cyberspace: An Analysis of Portrayals of Manhood in Men's Rights Activist Websites". Social Sciences, dating a mgtow guy. 5 (2): doi/socsci
  • Thalen, Mikael (August 3, ). "Reddit bans notorious anti-feminist subreddit 'Men Going Their Own Way'". The Daily Dot. Retrieved August 4,
  • Van Valkenburgh, Shawn P. (December 4, ). "Digesting the Red Pill: Masculinity and Neoliberalism in the Manosphere". Men and Masculinities. 24: 84– doi/X ISSN&#;X.
  • Winter, Aaron (). "Online Hate: From the Far-Right to the 'Alt-Right' and from the Margins to the Mainstream". In Lumsden, Karen; Harmer, Emily (eds.). Online Othering: Exploring Digital Violence and Discrimination on the Web. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. pp.&#;39– ISBN&#.
  • Wright, Scott; Trott, Verity; Jones, Callum (). "'The pussy ain't worth it, bro': assessing the discourse and structure of MGTOW". Information, Communication & Society. 23 (6): – doi/X ISSN&#;X. S2CID&#;
  • Zuckerberg, Donna (). Not All Dead White Men: Classics and Misogyny in the Digital Age. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN&#. OCLC&#;

Further reading

External links

  • The dictionary definition of MGTOW at Wiktionary
Источник: [alovex.co]
dating a mgtow guy

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *